Home Blog Page 22

TIGA SOSOK PENDIDIK PERGURUAN TINGGI, IMPLEMENTASI MBKM

.

.

TIGA SOSOK PENDIDIK PERGURUAN TINGGI,

IMPLEMENTASI MBKM

.

.

  Kita sering mendengar istilah dosen, instruktur dan tutor dalam proses pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi. Namun seringkali kita melupakan peran berbeda ketiganya. Tampak umumnya Perguruan Tinggi (PT) hanya menitikberatkan pada dosen sebagai pendidik. Bahkan mungkin PT menyederhanakan, baik pengajaran pengetahuan dan keterampilan sama-sama dilakukan sosok dosen. Padahal syarat menjadi dosen adalah S-2. Seseorang yang bergelar S-2 walau sudah pasti memiliki pengetahuan, namun belum tentu memiliki keterampilan.

  PT yang melakukan hal ini, biasanya berkompromi mengesampingkan aspek keterampilan dosen, yang penting berijazah S-2. Pada kegiatan pengajaran pengetahuan, dosen tidak akan mengalami kesulitan berarti. Namun pada kegiatan praktikum, dosen akan menghadapi kendala karena kurang penguasaan keterampilan. Proses praktikum menjadi dilakukan seadanya dan semampunya. Proses praktikum dipasrahkan kepada asisten yang hanya berstatus senior satu tahun di atas peserta praktikum. Hasilnya tentu lulusan memiliki kompetensi yang tidak lengkap, terutama pada aspek keterampilan mereka. Selain itu dengan merangkap jabatan sebagai instruktur, tri dharma lain dosen yakni melakukan penelitian, dan pengabdian kepada masyarakat bisa jadi terbengkelai. Padahal penelitian dan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini penting untuk meningkatkan pengembangan keilmuan, penguatan konten pembelajaran, serta peningkatan jabatan fungsional dosen, serta peningkatan peringkat PT tersebut.

  Mengacu Permenristekdikti Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 tentang Registrasi Pendidik pada PT, mengklasifikasikan pendidik di pendidikan tinggi dalam tiga sosok, yakni: (1) dosen, (2) instruktur, dan (3) tutor. Dosen adalah pendidik profesional dan ilmuwan dengan tugas utama mentransformasikan, mengembangkan, serta menyebarluaskan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi melalui pendidikan, penelitian dan pengabdian kepada masyarakat. Instruktur adalah pendidik yang menekankan pembinaan pada penguasaan aspek keterampilan di perguruan tinggi. Sedang Tutor adalah pendidik yang diangkat untuk membantu dosen dan berfungsi memfasilitasi belajar mahasiswa dalam sistem pendidikan tinggi. Baik dosen, instruktur, maupun tutor berdasar Permenristekdikti tersebut diakui sebagai pendidik, yang membedakan adalah peran mereka masing-masing. Dosen mengajarkan teori lewat pengajaran, instruktur mengajarkan praktek lewat praktikum, sedangkan tutor mengajarkan cara menyelesaikan soal melalui kegiatan tutorial.

  Peran ketiga sosok pendidik tersebut diperkuat Permendikbud Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 tentang Standar Pendidikan Tinggi yang menegaskan pada Pasal 5 ayat (1) bahwa Standar kompetensi lulusan merupakan kriteria minimal tentang kualifikasi kemampuan lulusan yang mencakup sikap, pengetahuan, dan keterampilan yang dinyatakan dalam rumusan Capaian Pembelajaran lulusan.

  Terkait sikap Pasal 6, ayat (1) menyebutkan bahwa Sikap sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 5 ayat (1) merupakan perilaku benar dan berbudaya sebagai hasil dari internalisasi dan aktualisasi nilai dan norma yang tercermin dalam kehidupan spiritual dan sosial melalui proses Pembelajaran, pengalaman kerja mahasiswa, Penelitian dan/atau Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat yang terkait Pembelajaran. Sikap ini tentunya diajarkan oleh ketiga sosok pendidik tersebut sesuai perannya.

  Terkait pengetahuan, ayat (2) menyebutkan bahwa Pengetahuan sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 5 ayat (1) merupakan penguasaan konsep, teori, metode, dan/atau falsafah bidang ilmu tertentu secara sistematis yang diperoleh melalui penalaran dalam proses Pembelajaran, pengalaman kerja mahasiswa, Penelitian dan/atau Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat yang terkait Pembelajaran. Disinilah peran dosen menjadi yang utama.

  Terkait keterampilan, ayat (3) menyebutkan bahwa Keterampilan sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 5 ayat (1) merupakan kemampuan melakukan unjuk kerja dengan menggunakan konsep, teori, metode, bahan, dan/atau instrumen, yang diperoleh melalui Pembelajaran, pengalaman kerja mahasiswa, Penelitian dan/atau Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat yang terkait Pembelajaran. Keterampilan mencakup: a. keterampilan umum sebagai kemampuan kerja umum yang wajib dimiliki oleh setiap lulusan dalam rangka menjamin kesetaraan kemampuan lulusan sesuai tingkat program dan jenis Pendidikan Tinggi; dan b. keterampilan khusus sebagai kemampuan kerja khusus yang wajib dimiliki oleh setiap lulusan sesuai dengan bidang keilmuan Program Studi. Disinilah peran instruktur menjadi yang utama.

  Terkait pengalaman kerja mahasiswa, ayat (4) menyebutkan bahwa Pengalaman kerja mahasiswa sebagaimana dimaksud pada ayat (2) dan ayat (3) berupa pengalaman dalam kegiatan di bidang tertentu pada jangka waktu tertentu, berbentuk pelatihan kerja, kerja praktik, praktik kerja lapangan atau bentuk kegiatan lain yang sejenis. Disini pula peran instruktur menjadi penting.

  Dalam konteks di atas ketiga sosok tersebut mempunyai peran yang saling menguatkan dalam proses pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi atau dalam sistem pendidikan tinggi, sehingga capaian Pembelajaran lulusan dapat dipenuhi dengan optimal. Namun di lapangan jarang kita menemukan tiga sosok pendidik tersebut dalam pendidikan tinggi. Umumnya sosok dosen yang lebih menonjol. Padahal peran ketiga sosok tersebut berfungsi menghasilkan capaian pembelajaran sebagaimana diharapkan peserta didik dan sistem pendidikan tinggi itu sendiri.

MBKM memacu peran tiga sosok Pendidik ?

  Kampus Merdeka (”Merdeka Belajar – Kampus Merdeka/MBKM”) diluncurkan 24 Januari 2020. Kebijakan MBKM dalam rangka mewujudkan proses pembelajaran di PT yang otonom dan fleksibel sehingga PT mampu merancang dan melaksanakan proses pembelajaran inovatif agar mahasiswa dapat meraih capaian pembelajaran mencakup aspek sikap, pengetahuan, dan keterampilan secara optimal. Kebijakan MBKM bertujuan meningkatkan “link and match” dengan dunia usaha dan dunia industri, serta mempersiapkan mahasiswa dalam dunia kerja sejak awal. Juga untuk meningkatkan kompetensi lulusan, baik soft skills maupun hard skills agar lebih siap dan relevan dengan kebutuhan zaman, serta menyiapkan lulusan sebagai pemimpin masa depan bangsa yang unggul dan berkepribadian.

  Kata kunci pelaksanaan MBKM adalah inovasi dan kreativitas PT. Juga dukungan dan kerja sama berbagai pihak mulai sivitas akademika, kementerian lain, serta khususnya dunia usaha dan industri. Kebijakan MBKM episode di atas disusul episode Keempat – Organisasi Penggerak, episode Kelima – Guru Penggerak, episode Keenam – Transfomasi Dana Pemerintah untuk Perguruan Tinggi, episode Ketujuh – Sekolah Penggerak, episode Kesembilan – Kartu Indonesia Pintar/KIP Kuliah Merdeka, episode Kesepuluh Perluasan Program Beasiswa Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan, dan episode Kesebelas Kampus Merdeka Vokasi.

  Kunci lain MBKM adalah hak belajar mahasiswa 3 semester di luar Prodi. Ini artinya akan mengubah struktur kurikulum – akan ada kluster hak belajar di dalam Prodi dan kluster hak belajar di luar Prodi dengan delapan kegiatan, yakni: magang/praktik kerja, proyek di desa, mengajar di sekolah, pertukaran pelajar, penelitian/riset, kegiatan wirausaha, studi/proyek independen, serta proyek kemanusiaan. Hal ini melibatkan peran tiga sosok pendidik di perguruan tinggi tadi (dosen, instruktur dan tutor).

  Mengacu hal di atas, PT mendapatkan instruktur dari dunia usaha dan industri yang tentunya ahli di bidangnya. Instruktur mengajar keterampilan kepada mahasiswa. Karena bukan dosen, maka instruktur tersebut dapat berkonsentrasi pada kegiatan pengajaran keterampilan (praktikum) disamping itu secara hukum tidak memiliki kewajiban penelitian dan pengabdian masyarakat sebagaimana halnya dosen.

  Bagi instruktur ahli dari industri ini mengajar mahasiswa secara paruh waktu sehingga tidak perlu kehilangan pendapatannya di industri, namun tetap dapat membagikan keterampilannya di PT melalui magang mahasiswa. Pendidik dengan model seperti ini tetap dapat didaftarkan ke Kemdikbudristek dan memiliki Nomor Urut Pendidik (NUP) bagi yang bergelar di bawah magister (S-2) atau Nomor Induk Dosen Khusus (NIDK) bagi yang bergelar master S-2 ke atas. Bahkan jika praktisi dari industri ini mengikuti program Rekognisi Pembelajaran Lampau (RPL) dan hasilnya kompetensinya setara dengan S-2, bukan saja ahli mengajar keterampilan sebagai instruktur, melainkan juga bisa mengajar teori sebagai dosen.

  Untuk instruktur, negara tidak mempersyaratkan kualifikasi pendidikan, minimal memiliki kompetensi dan dapat mengajarkan keterampilannya Keterampilan tidak dapat diperoleh dari bangku pendidikan, melainkan dari pengalaman bekerja di lapangan.

  Keterampilan adalah aspek kompetensi yang sama pentingnya dengan pengetahuan, sehingga sudah selayaknya proses pengajarannya diperhatikan dengan sungguh-sungguh dan dilakukan oleh pendidik yang benar-benar kompeten. Untuk dapat melakukannya PT bisa melakukan dengan cara yang efektif yakni memaksimalkan peran instruktur dari dunia usaha dan industri sehubungan. Hal ini tertuang dalamkebijakan MBKM. Dengan adanya instruktur, pengajaran keterampilan dapat lebih terjamin dan dosen dapat mengalokasikan waktu lebih pada kegiatan penelitian. (lee)

.

Dari berbagai Sumber

.

QUOTE EDUCATION Komunita Edisi

.

1.The best way to predict the future is to create it.  – Peter Drucker, Management guru
2.If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.  – President John Quincy Adams
3.Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower. – Steve Jobs, co-founder and CEO of Apple

.

Sumber : https://thinkstrategicforschools.com/inspirational-leadership-quotes-school-leaders/

.

.

Covid-19 pandemic: “RESILIENCE” AND “NEW EQUILIBRIUM” THE HIGHER EDUCATION?

0

Covid-19 pandemic:

“RESILIENCE” AND “NEW EQUILIBRIUM”

THE HIGHER EDUCATION?

Dr. Gleb Tsipursky provides an alternative to dealing with the Pandemic in his book Resilience: Adapt and Plan for the New Abnormal of the COVID-19 Coronavirus Pandemic, 8 May 2020. He outlines research-based strategies on how organizations – whether government, business, non-profit organizations, and individuals and households can adapt effectively to the New Abnormal and similar disasters. He demonstrates how to develop effective strategic plans and make the best big decisions in the context of the uncertainty and ambiguity posed by the Covid-19 Pandemic and other large-scale disasters. He recommends government organizations, businesses, nonprofits, and high-stakes individuals and households to get out of the current situation. An investment to create a survival strategy until the pandemic ends.

Gleb Tsipursky is a behavioral economist and cognitive neuroscientist, with expertise in recognizing the blind spots – cognitive biases – that lead us to misunderstand reality and make fatal mistakes in decision making. What he expressed was related to the behavior of organizations and leaders during the Pandemic period, which has been and is being addressed by the world of higher education as well. Does it reflect Gleb’s thinking? Let’s see.

Dr. H. Asep Effendi, SE., M.Si., PIA., CFrA., CRBC

The Rector of Sangga Buana University (USB)

Komunita: The pandemic is entering its second year, while private universities are prepared to provide face-to-face (offline) education. Of course, it’s a tough challenge to be able to maintain the learning process?

Dr. H. Asep Effendi: If we talk about policies regarding education management in higher education, I think it is the same as other campuses in a platform to keep this Pandemic from spreading everywhere and taking many victims. With health protocols and other policies, learning is online or based on an independent campus. However, I have 2 main things in this situation. First, educational normative should have started to redesign how the system of assessment and assessment of success. If our learning system is already in 2 (two) years or the second year. Initially, the same as other universities experienced a severe shock, when lecturers were forced to change learning from conventional to having to switch to an IT system or become an online lecture. It is not easy to educate them, especially because of the relatively old age factor (our lecturers need their knowledge and experience). It’s a homework in itself. At that time, we prepared 2 training sessions for lecturers who did not understand information technology (IT). Even our policy provides the easiest for them, the important thing is that learning continues.

There are changes that occur: 1) a shift in investment from physical buildings to information technology (infrastructure side) to support learning; 2) the HR side has shifted from conventional to IT systems, this also requires investment financing; 3) prepare all curricula and learning systems that are supported by the IT system.

Second is governance. There are 6 points of extraordinary change in university governance in the pandemic era. One, Universities are no longer the main destination, especially in terms of buildings, but all students will become people who are focused and focused on IT. IT support is central. So the first reinvestment changed. Foundations have to open their minds, can’t maintain a good building if IT doesn’t support it. This means that the building is not worth anything when it is not able to carry out learning that is fully supported by IT. So the university’s operational budget shifted.

Two from the HR side, there are lecturers and administrative staff. Lecturers are normatively obligated to enter the slot and must be ready. Now the support of education staff, all learning movements that must be supported by human resources who use IT. So we also have to train them, educate them, and at the same time have to start selectively which jobs remain conventional or in IT. But the totality is IT. In my opinion, in the future, graduates of both management, accounting, information systems, everything must be based on IT. Because based on it is accepted by the company. If he is good at accounting but IT is weak, he will not be accepted. So all majors’ / study programs must apply the IT System, at least the material is integrated in IT, the knowledge is entered. Some people say IT is just a tool, that’s true, but these tools have become significant. When people are asked about the accounting process, do they memorize it or not? How to journal he memorized? But once brought to IT, he did not understand. So we have orientation for lecturers, employees, and students.

Third, work system governance. It is no longer possible to survive conventionally, because they are used to being online. There are indeed offline talks and so on, but in their minds they are used to zoom meetings. In the future, people will be lazy to meet on campus. Automatically in organizational governance there is a shift. Then there are indicators of assessment of structural performance, lecturers, employees who must be IT-based. Currently working on a staffing system. So later lecturers and employees can see what section and job description. Leaders and the Foundation will monitor this and later will bring up performance measures. That’s in terms of communication and work coordination.

Fourth, it must make a comprehensive assessment format related to the learning carried out. Because we know conventional learning and IT are not the same. For example, when we give assignments, students can get the same answer. This cannot be allowed. We can’t just let them pass. Science is science, quality is quality. It can’t be said that the era is like this, the important copy-paste students they collect. Measuring performance is only a part of the quality of education that we want to produce.

Fifth, reaffirming existing infrastructure governance. Sixth, Foundations and Higher Education Leaders think as entrepreneurs. Because there is idle infrastructure, we have to think about what this campus will do if tomorrow or the day after tomorrow it can’t be implemented again. Bandung is on lockdown. September starts a new school still in lockdown, maybe next semester will still be in lockdown. So the last option, let’s think entrepreneur. Leaders of Universities and Foundations should think like that. In an era when other people no longer need a large building, no need for a large or grand office. We are currently planning the engineering of a room that other people can use later. How to do it? We are discussing this with the Foundation. In the future, a studio will be formed in the form of a studio designed to be a place for people who need a room for seminars, classrooms, etc.

The 6 points above we designed to deal with the Covid-19 pandemic. Our principle is the pandemic does not stop creativity and innovation, it must continue. We have to set an example for students, not just because of the pandemic, colleges are stuck. On the sidelines of buildings that require maintenance, there must be income. I think other universities have experienced the same thing, it’s just a matter of how to map and determine the priority scale that we can prioritize or follow.

Komunita: How about in terms of learning content? Students with a strictly regulated study period?

Dr. H. Asep Effendi: First, we look at the undergraduate and Diploma programs (2 segments). In the undergraduate segment, we cannot close our eyes that basic science or basic theory must focus. So I always remind undergraduate to try not to use too much infocus-based teaching materials. If the lecturer can’t explore more deeply, the students will only be textual like the one in Infocus. Meanwhile, the books that students have to read are not touched anymore. Please lecturers use infocus, but still bring the reference book. Tell the students the points/chapters, please open them, and state what the contents.

Online learning doesn’t work that way. We are designing an independent campus curriculum concept. In the future, the UTS/UAS lecturers must also be directed. We will try to explore, not one way anymore (lecturers keep giving material). But let students be given the provision of problems and can dig deeper, open all knowledge and students’ presentations of what the analysis looks like. That’s from a learning perspective. We used to let lecturers talk 2 hours in front of the class (because there the lecturers could explore stories, experiences, etc.). But if we try to look again, it turns out that students stare at the screen for 1 hour most effectively. More than that, it’s out of focus. So in an hour, the lecturer does not need to elaborate anymore, straight to the point. And students discuss further, so that their thoughts are alive. That’s why we change the learning method.

From the assessment system, we have several components (task 1, task 2, UTS, study/analysis UAS). Task 1 and task 2 are usually the part that is explored more deeply, whether it’s a presentation or an analytical review. By involving more students, it can make students more active, not passive just waiting for material/slides from lecturers (that’s what we change in independent campus learning). During UTS and UAS, lecturers are directed not to ask questions about topics whose answers will be “uniform”. However, we talk more about cases, which give rise to theories. For example, a student tells a story about creating a market (underneath what theory is mentioned). It was different, meaning he had read. Do not let students lose basic science. When studying Master, not much knowledge shifts. In conclusion, the undergraduate is the basic fundamental of theory.

Master has been purely applied, lecturers may give assignments that have been “released” on student creativity. Everyone will be given a different challenge, so the answer will be different. The standard of assessment has not changed, but the material being assessed has changed. For example, it is not just a matter of attendance which has great value, now it is no longer, but indeed enters the time discipline assessment (still not shifting). Weaknesses in the IT world, students cannot be forced, they will come in a place that is comfortable for those without pressure. It is our responsibility as educators and to maintain the trust of students’ parents to educate and make quality students. We try our best and always fix which is the crucial point.

Second, structurally, the role of the guardian lecturer is very important. In one semester, it is scheduled to meet the students at least 2 times. There are many personal obstacles experienced by students in the learning process, so where do they channel it, while they rarely meet with lecturers, or with the Head of Study Program, etc. So we encourage the Guardian Lecturer to communicate with students. It can be through seminars, interactive dialogues, webinars, so that they are maintained (outside the learning program).

Komunita: Learning full of digital technology (online) turns out that many lecturers are not ready.

Dr. H. Asep Effendi: There are lecturers who are not comfortable with zoom, or don’t understand using zoom/google meet, etc. In the first year it was very hard, until the IT team was confused about education. However, the odd semester yesterday has decreased the difficulty level of its use. We continue to evaluate when lecturers give assignments not through e-Learning.

The IT team guides and trains lecturers in making materials, for example making Power Point slides or videos with animation, sound, etc. It’s homework, you need to be patient. If it’s still difficult but knowledge is needed, then we make a teaching team, collaborate the knowledge from the “old” ones, and the IT technical from the teaching team. We seek such assistance, hopefully there will be no significant complaints related to learning.

For students, our evaluation is even semester, 60% of students do not like online (early stage). They miss the conventional. Because they went to conventional school from the start, unlike UT. The students miss the atmosphere of the lectures. However, we always prioritize moral responsibility. If one educates, the results will be seen in the next 20-30 years.

 

Komunita: Is there a stigma due to the pandemic that makes students feel down-graded, and there is a lost generation?

Dr. H. Asep Effendi: Pandemic conditions if allowed to continue without proper handling, the mental and quality of students can deviate from the original goal. Don’t let there be the term covid graduate or covid alumni. We strive for certification, giving students something to be proud of. Indeed, I have not researched more deeply, how the effect of this online learning. In the learning process: First, we do not prohibit faculties or study programs from holding seminars on research results, practical work results are carried out offline as long as they comply with health protocols. So that there is confidence for students that the results of their research will be tested. Hopefully this method can reduce. Testing the principle provides additional education, certain values, and criticizes something. So there are several programs that we do offline, strictly implementing health protocols. This means that they experience face-to-face education, and have a good ending. I want them to be proud when they bring a diploma to apply for a job in a company for example.

Second, higher education has an interest, related to cash in. Every student entering college has high hopes. Don’t let it go beyond your expectations when you graduate. That is our effort or work to encourage lecturers and employees so that this pandemic does not degrade the quality and education process for students. At least the same, thankfully there is time efficiency but gain effectiveness in learning. If students are successful, we will be proud that we are an institution that produces quality graduates. But if students fail, then we feel ashamed as an institution that produces poor graduates. We are entrusted with building integrity.

Lost generation must be minimized so that it does not happen. How sick students will be if they are called covid graduates. We must provide education if students are called that, must be able to defend themselves by answering me online lectures, unlike conventional predecessors. It’s just a different method. In addition, the government should also have tools to control online learning. Do not let the important thing pass first, and do not generalize to all graduates as a form of natural selection. It takes seriousness from university leaders to maintain the target of human resource quality in the future, where the government has a stake in policy, namely more policies that provide freedom. That’s where the freedom that universities can use to be competitive and advantif.

Komunita: Is The pandemic triggers us to be creative, and test leadership?

Dr. H. Asep Effendi: That’s right, I agree. Learning in the era of the Covid pandemic and conventional methods is different, but the spirit is the same. If the spirit is the same, want to run wherever the initial goal will be achieved. There was one incident in Postgraduate, where active students asked for additional learning and they were willing to provide their own links. We are always associated with the name rewards; it cannot be denied. Each meeting must be prepared for payment. However, the most important thing is that there is continuous education for lecturers regarding the understanding of their duties. We have a taklim assembly Friday morning, recitation from 08-10 am. The policy is for all lecturers and employees to sit in the room following the recitation. No one was working at that time. In these activities we insert messages about our vision and mission. We continue to motivate and inflame sincere work and the power of Allah SWT. If in the future we get more budget, it is not impossible that it will affect the welfare of lecturers and employees as well.

Management and leadership are very important. We must have the tools to control. In this pandemic condition, students are also having a hard time, if they want to complain to whom? We try to balance the rights and obligations. That’s what we do every week, by spiritually motivating lecturers and students. We prioritize mutual cooperation, harmony, good cooperation, then we will be blessed and blessed by Allah SWT.

Komunita: What are the benefits of government policies related to relaxation and funding for higher education?

Dr. H. Asep Effendi: If we talk about private sector, we still depend on tuition fees. But let’s see that the adequacy of the funding figure is far from the quality standard (excluding the quality of BAN PT), because it is a down grade. To reduce this gap, university leaders and foundations must work hard. How to keep learning quality with the finances we have? PTS is looking for students, raising money, managing, teaching, with the same quality as the country. This is not light work. That’s why the leaders of PTS are great people. As long as his leadership is guaranteed sustainability, quality is focused.

We hope that there will no longer be such higher education (PTN – PTS) dichotomy. The law on teachers and lecturers is the same, the certification of lecturers is the same, the required educational standards are the same. The difference is that it was established by the government and the private sector. Why is the priority scale for PTN? We don’t have any competition at PTN. Should the facilities be like PTN? Buildings are given by the government; salaries are also from the government. Why are PTN and PTS always different, with the current atmosphere, everyone is experiencing a pandemic. Universities have their own homework; the target is the same. This country must be supported by the same quality human resources. PTS are given the opportunity to expand their business and so on, what all private universities cannot do. So there are 3 segments of higher education: 1) official higher education, 2) corporate backed up higher education, 3) Independent higher education.

We ourselves set up business units to support and maximize the tuition fee efforts. It should be more focused on government policies on governance that are adopted equally, so here there is a disbursement of funds that must go to private universities. Because PTS also have to live. How can accreditation be good (score 9) if the capital is not enough. In college governance, we still consider that the pandemic is our stepping stone. But here there is hard work on how to cultivate the existing potential, the existing advantages, in order to be competitive.

Komunita: What is your commitment, hope and message to all?

Dr. H. Asep Effendi: Our commitment is not to complain about the existing conditions (complaining has no value). Our hope is not to think about when it will be finished, but to think about what to do. Our recipes are productive, innovative, creative. An internal message for us, this pandemic is a test from Allah SWT for us to come to be winners. There is a slogan for us, we are not followers, but the Winners. That’s what I keep emphasizing. For PT’s friends, we have a big homework to do, graduate quality students as future generations of the nation and produce the best graduates. For the State, from now on, the position of PTN and PTS is equal, both in the corridor of assistance and policies. We are all obedient and submissive to the State, it’s just a matter of how the facilities obtained by PTS to produce quality human resources are commensurate with PTN. There is no dichotomy between PTN and PTS because everything has been equated in laws, rules and other provisions. (Rewrite & Interview: Lili Irahali; Audio to Transcript: Intan Liswandini)

Dr. Cahyat Rohyana, SE., MM.

Chairman of the Bhakti Pos Indonesia Education Foundation (YPBPI)

Komunita: The problem with higher education is quality. It’s been more than 1.5 years since a pandemic has forced online learning. How to respond it?

Dr. Cahyat Rohyana, S.E., M.M: The pandemic has taken us by surprise. Anyone does not deny that the pandemic is a visible challenge that touches all aspects of education.

The Bhakti Pos Indonesia Foundation organizes two educational institutions. The Indonesian Logistics College is more academic, and another Pos Indonesia Polytechnic was established in 2009. Meanwhile, the Indonesian Logistics College is only 6 years old. Our students come from many regions throughout Indonesia. This pandemic forces them to return to their respective areas, but have to go to college and continue to study.

Alhamdulillah, our infrastructure with IT support helps online teaching and learning activities, even though we make learning programs that are certainly different. Many of our students come from the area and return to their area. One of the obstacles is the internet network which is of poor quality, not the same in every region. Also power outages in the area, and other technical matters. The other side is internet quota. Not all students have enough quota and can afford to buy the quota. The quota assistance from the Ministry is sufficient to help students study online or continue their studies.

We always think creatively and never give up, while increasing our immunity as an institution. Three things to pay attention to: First, continuing to study is a formidable challenge. Several layers of the family are usually normal economic conditions, now there are many declines. The dilemma between maintaining health protocols and maintaining life. Second, the ability of educational resources to decline is affected. SPP is one of the problems? We do relaxation for SPP obligations. Third, the quality of learning. How to guarantee the quality of offline or offline compared to online or online remains the same? We as the organizing body are always proactive in managing education, Poltekpos and Stimlog during this pandemic.

Screenshot 2021-06-21 14-54-29

Dr. Ir. Agus Purnomo, M.T –

Director of the Indonesian Postal Polytechnic: Pandemic period that pays the most attention to changes in learning culture. Get used to face-to-face to be brave with an unplanned system due to the Covid-19 disaster. We try to synchronize between face-to-face and virtual.

Institutionally, learning management has become a digital application. The problem is that students have not been able to follow 100%, because there are areas that are not covered by the signal. Then the issue of quotas or assistance from the Ministry. Initially we used WA groups. After subsidizing the quota, the learning process uses Zoom meetings. However, students have not been able to follow 100%. Then we develop other relevant lessons, connecting Youtube with cross-interest material through webinars or virtual learning. Furthermore, the materials are stored in Google Meet, Google DOC and Google classroom. Through these learning models we assign assignments and educate students. These efforts support learning to be carried out anytime, anywhere. Students do not have to come directly to campus. Face-to-face is done when practicum in the laboratory such as cutting wires, cutting metal or scissors. However, we carry out offline learning in the form of hybrid learning, such as work practices, projects, and internships. Those are the challenges that we feel, as well as to promote independent learning campuses.

We are in this pandemic condition; it does not reduce the quality of learning materials received by students like the previous model. In understanding the content, as well as encouraging them to continue to believe in the bold model, it does not reduce the quality of incomplete scholars. Without reducing the competence of each student in accordance with the competence of the study program. Even the advantages of online learning are group assignments where the group prepares to study independently. Independent study according to the given lesson plan. Each student has the task of recording assignments from various sources into short videos uploaded on Youtube. They are more creative and don’t know how to open the internet. Learning also increases the competence of digital media. I think this will be an educational model for the future of hybrid learning. Online contains a lot of material that can increase their knowledge from various sources and countries.

Positive thing, online learning builds independent and more competent students. This actually adds softskills to the world of work. We affirm that the pandemic positively certainly makes the education process quality. That is an innovation effort in responding to the relevance of the world of education during the pandemic

Rachmawati Wangsaputra, Ph.D., – Head of STIMLOG: The pandemic does have an impact on degradation but also opportunities for change. At first we were surprised. However, after starting, the lecturer adapts to improve the quality of soft skills, which even exceeds expectations. For example, trained to learn efficiently and effectively. But to be honest, because it’s so easy to have a meeting in just 2 minutes, we can change the meeting without going to the place. Immediately change some habits, such as checking the final project first, it must be hardcopy and continuous, there is a common thread, and it must be able to do it by email and by whatsapp as well as by telegram.

Indeed, face-to-face with virtual face-to-face is very different because something is missing, such as direct education of students’ morals. Disciplined, undisciplined, or not late or on time. It must be adapted to the online learning model. For example, if it is more than 9 o’clock, you are not allowed to take lessons. It used to be difficult to use softcopy, now I’m used to it. Finally found the forms or syllabus of the material such as links to learning resources and others. In class students become more active and it turns out that they learn better too. With online lecturers happy, it turns out that there are so many things that can be used to improve student skills. However, one thing that must be learned continuously is how to educate students’ honesty through online learning models. I notice students who are sleepy or interested. As lecturers, how can they be active in class even though they are online. Now it’s starting to decrease and from the challenge side again, collaboration is the key.

We take advantage of collaboration, if the class has collaboration, it must attract students. Take advantage of collaboration with other alliances or LSPs. The point is to give the best for students. We plan for hybrid learning, but the efficient and effective conditions must be maintained and efficiency must be achieved. Before the lesson we had prepared and actually did it. Very much take advantage of resources in cyberspace that enrich learning.

Komunita: Is the pandemic a new equilibrium for universities?

Dr. Cahyat Rohyana, S.E., M.M: I emphatically say yes. Nations that are more organized or developed countries are already like that, one step or two ahead of us. There are several professions and jobs missing. The pandemic must be addressed. The keyword is “shifting behavior”. The pandemic is not a barrier, but the “opportunity” and momentum to foster initiatives that are able to solve various problems in this time of crisis. So, of course, encouraging higher education institutions to be innovative in the creative, flexible and tenacious learning process, by utilizing knowledge and technology as “enablers” and “transformers”, without reducing the quality of learning and the quality of graduates that we carry together. Because, the end of education still has to produce human resources / graduate students who are able to continue to develop in line with the dynamics of the business and industrial world facing Industry 4.0.

Although there are weaknesses here and there will be a new learning model in the future. During a pandemic, maybe a new digitalization process like this? There are many positive things that can be developed in order to create a learning model that can certainly answer the next century, strengthened by digital technology and other technologies. This means that we, both public and private universities, can still demonstrate the quality of the implementation and management of good learning.

Komunita The pandemic has an impact on “loss generation”, and a demographic bonus? Can PTS synergy help?

Dr. Cahyat Rohyana, S.E., M.M: What I mean by lost generation is that the Indonesian nation is unable to compete with other nations. Wouldn’t there be a lost generation like that? Our nation is a nation that is tough and capable of fighting, adapting to new gadgets and habits. Several things have been done in the world of education, such as the government helping the needs of the community, also in terms of technology, infrastructures are starting to be good, as well as great young entrepreneurs who must be able to eliminate the stigma of the lost generation.

Now the government encourages college students to study at other public or private universities or vice versa. This is one of the Ministry’s efforts to encourage synergy between the organizing body or universities so that we can send students to each other. Maybe there is learning atmosphere, there is learning biology or geography. This is one of the learning models. We really have to develop students’ multidisciplinary mastery in improving future solutions. It is not enough that logistics science invites logistics science, it could be with other sciences. It is better to work together to collaborate on curriculum adjustments. For example, Pos Indonesia Polytechnic studied at Widyatama for accounting and management.

The hallmark of our education is supply chain management. However, we are thinking about other factors, what the future should look like from the economic, political and social aspects. Do not let existing products become obsolete. We do a review of what digitization is headed for. Underlining the message of the President Director of Pos Indonesia (Persero) – Faizal Rochmad Djoemadi, that digital transformation is mandatory. Presence is changed to digitization for employees. Likewise, learning is done online, which we check online.

Another program that we do is post learning course. Pos Indonesia has branches throughout Indonesia, students can do internships in companies that collaborate with Pos Indonesia Polytechnics throughout Indonesia and be credited for lectures. We need to synergize to form alliances in order to improve student competencies so that the demographic bonus becomes a reality as expected in the economic field, social order or the world of work. The point is that we must remain optimistic. It is our obligation to answer all challenges in order to educate students to compete in the world of work, even from abroad or within the country. Once again this is our obligation as education providers and educators.

Komunita: How is the Pos Indonesia Polytechnic learning model developed, so that the competencies of students or graduates link & match with the industrial and business world.

Dr. Cahyat Rohyana, S.E., M.M: Like in Japan, there are times when a CEO or director becomes the Chancellor of a university or a Chancellor or dean becomes the CEO of a large company. This means that he can theory as well as practice. We encourage the strengthening of skills or skills. Vocational depends on the level of education of students, skills can support or balance. Say students are equipped with business ethics, soft skills are needed to strengthen students to enter the workplace. High GPA but does not guarantee use in the workplace. For those who are academically directed to be managerial. For example, if you are a leader in a company, you must know the technical and corporate knowledge. In terms of knowledge, there must be, regarding the effectiveness of the learning model, we communicate with users in the world of work. We discussed with other corporate associations who became users. What are our students lacking? What guidance do you need going forward? Guidance from the industry itself, from universities, and others. We try to do everything completely.

Komunita: Hopes and messages to fellow colleagues, government and universities.

Dr. Cahyat Rohyana, S.E., M.M: We are faced with a condition of Adaptation to New Habits, and thank God the world of education has passed the transition period. Message for education staff and others with Adaptation of New Habits, Industry 4.0 and us becoming immigrants in the millennial world. Whatever student activities and institutional development, millennials are still the hosts. Not following along but with the right reasons and research. The key word is let’s adapt wisely and wisely.

For the government, we welcome the government’s efforts to maintain the quality of education by providing relaxation and prudence in responding to field conditions. Another hope is that the government will continue to monitor what is needed, such as internet quotas, network availability so that virtual contact runs well. Also clarity about link and match needs to be realized further. So our preparation is more stable and more confident to apply it. Education is a mandate that becomes the practice of jariyah. If we work together as social developers who contribute in the field of higher education and educate the nation’s children. The next step is to complement each other between universities in implementing independent campuses, independent learning.

The pandemic period has encouraged us to find positive things that we can develop in order to continue to improve the quality and governance of education with effective and efficient productive learning methods. So that it continues to produce a good educational process, producing outstanding graduates for Indonesia (Rewrite & Interview: Lili Irahali; Audio to Transcript: Yanda Ramadana)

Dr. H. Sugiyanto, M.Sc.

Vice Rector for Student and Alumni Academic Affairs – IKOPIN

Komunita: Facing the Covid-19 Pandemic which has almost 2 years of problematic PTS – which relies on self-financing and the number of students – what is it like?

Dr. Sugiyanto, M.Sc.: We were shocked by the circumstances at the start of the Pandemic. We utilize impromptu information technology to prepare online lectures, then prepare a blended learning system. We are working with UT and IBM to find an effective learning system.

During the Covid-19 Pandemic, which was limited by the first health protocol, we couldn’t help but put all learning and administration online using existing technology. At first, using Zoom Meeting which lasted only 40 minutes, the problem was extraordinary. Second, our readiness from the Institute side and the student side is related to the availability of networks and internet quotas that are burdensome for students. In terms of the Institute, we have to increase investment in online technology, but it is outside our RKA budget. Then from the lecturer’s readiness side, the lecturer was surprised by this application. Online learning materials must be prepared and delivered in a different way, because at that time they used materials for face-to-face classes. The obstacles are extraordinary. Lecturers get bored quickly while students become unenthusiastic.

Another problem, of course, is the economic side, many parents of students may be lacking in material terms, and their income is reduced. Consequences on SPP. We experienced nearly 400 students complaining. We take certain actions and policies that are very problematic at the beginning.

Komunita: What are the facts about the new adaptation related to infrastructure, readiness of lecturers and student readiness and relaxation of the financial side?

Dr. Sugiyanto, M.Sc.: First, regarding the quota at that time, we adopted a subsidy policy with a different amount each month per undergraduate and postgraduate student, then related to tuition fees, following the abilities of their parents. In infrastructure we invest in many things such as servers, create our own LMS. With the permission of the Rector, we made the decision that LMS must be created by ourselves. Alhamdulillah it went well and the consequences were good. If we are challenged by blended learning and online, why not dare. Efficiency occurs here and there and is offset by the cost of this fairly routine server, and a fairly large zoom connection rental. In that regard, we hold training for lecturers and employees here. As a result, we were able to connect with SPADA set by DIKTI, and the data that had to be uploaded to the DIKTI page was made easier. Including SPMI, we use LMS to evaluate several activities, especially those related to the teaching and learning process. Our efforts to improve this situation are first, so as not to be

Komunita: What extent do lecturers master the content with a learning model using technology, and it is easily absorbed by students?

Dr. Sugiyanto, M.Sc.: We encourage lecturers to prepare themselves so that their teaching and learning methods are adapted to the online system. We are strict on the use of RPS (study lesson plans) and always refer to RPS. Then we encourage lecturers to teach more creatively. Indeed, through this model, several students with the same answer were found. Regarding the material, using materials from the media, which can be on YouTube, papers and journals, our students direct them there. It is even used as a student assignment for a summary and the link must be included. These are efforts to provide reinforcement for learning.

Komunita: Can the current learning model encourage student independence to be stronger, including character development?

Dr. Sugiyanto, M.Sc.: This is a tough job. The use of technology with a relatively new learning system, as well as learning conditions must be online, due to pandemic reasons, as well as affecting economic conditions, of course, caused a lot of complaints. However, we still encourage students to study independently. Part of the character of today’s students, the term is struggle. This is indeed not easy with the old way of communication.

Our steps at the beginning of the lecture are always to awaken and invite all lecturers, so that in terms of teaching, it is not just conveying material. Likewise, in conditions like this, we have to make students aware that they will get optimal benefits if we understand properly using information technology, but with one condition, namely honesty. Sample exams (UAS) must be carried out to educate students to be honest by maximizing the online system as well as learning independence for students. This we are trying. For the formation of student character, we develop cooperative values ​​and principles for students. Studying at IKOPIN cooperative values ​​are the values ​​of togetherness, honesty, self-help, empathy for the community. This is what we always tell students.

Komunita: Is there a change in the assessment method, which in principle has the same value, and the objectivity of quality learning outcomes?

Dr. Sugiyanto, M.Sc.: Indeed, we don’t just rely on exams, usually the exams are the same thing, students may also be able to work together, especially those who are close. But we can’t guess like that. Then the proportions of the assessment must be clear. For example, 30% UTS exams, 40% UAS exams, of which 30% are assignments, maybe we should change this proportion. Assignments must be added and included in the LMS assignment, and the value is considered, so they are accustomed to writing and including references and bibliography as assigned assignments. That’s what we have to build. Including students who are writing a thesis or final project. Whether for undergraduate and postgraduate students including D3 starting last year with the pandemic condition, we also use similarity. It is learning for students, utilizing data with secondary data and writing must be written by yourself. That’s our effort to respond to the impact of the pandemic.

Komunita: Is there any change in the composition of lecture attendance?

Dr. Sugiyanto, M.Sc.: We keep adjusting at least 80%. We see from the results of the SPMI report, it turns out that the attendance of our students has increased higher, including the presence of lecturers is also higher. It turns out that in this condition it is more effective, maybe because it is at home. This is the positive impact. Especially for guidance, lecturers must find the right method for students. Because digital models via zoom meeting were not effective. We have prepared a zoom for each lecturer, and it turns out that lecturers must have other alternatives, so that the final project guidance is more effective. It is true that the lecturer should provide more time for this guidance.

Komunita: The undergraduate level must have a strong theoretical foundation, if Master is more Applied, this will certainly affect the online learning model.

Dr. Sugiyanto, M.Sc.: In fact, the proportion that is practical in this condition does seem to be slightly reduced, especially for undergraduates who have to understand theory, that concept is a must. Because of this condition, we emphasize to lecturers to divide the proportion of lecture time. If it’s 3 credits, it’s extraordinarily boring. For example, the first half hour is to deepen the theory and concepts, then the rest are specific cases and when it is enough we will show you the journals to strengthen the theory. Likewise, Master students are also strengthened with the same thing and are more practical. We also prepare such as writing cases/case studies. Keep our theory conveyed and prepare ourselves to think logically, look for problems and solve problems.

Komunita: What extent has the impact of this pandemic degraded the learning process and stigmatized graduates?

Dr. Sugiyanto, M.Sc.: In order to avoid the term degradation and stigma of LC (Covid Graduates) or Covid pandemic alumni. Of course we have to think together. However, I remain optimistic as long as all parties have the same commitment, so from the beginning we build and agree on the lecturer’s commitment to continue teaching to his students optimally, and we also realize that students do not have to study in class, this must be true. -really works. There must be a commitment from the two parties above to the learning outcomes. This has to happen and I’m sure there won’t be a relegation term, in fact I catch the opposite. Why? Initially they were not ready to go online, now students and lecturers are required to be literate in this online technology, young and old alike, must take advantage of this LMS from a to z, grades must be included, corrections must also be included. This will become habitual habit and students will no longer be ignorant and others. If from the material side, there are many things that are not conveyed, maybe because of boredom or something else. But if the RPS is clear, the target is clear, every meeting is clear, I’m sure it won’t be relegated for that. Plus, the commitment of lecturers, students and parents also play a role in it.

Unless one of the above is not committed, it may be relegated. Students sometimes online zoom is not visible / off camera; this is what we usually admonish the students one by one. I hope that online learning students can be seen by their parents. I am currently proposing SPMI to study at home, which involves parental control. According to parents, what kind of children are judged to learn and approximately there are parents who follow their children to learn.

Komunita: What is your perspective on graduates during the Pandemic?

Dr. Sugiyanto, M.Sc.: Revolution 4.0, among others, requires graduates to master information technology, better communication, and collaboration skills. Therefore, there are several things during this pandemic that encourage us to be more confident that online learning in this pandemic condition encourages children to master information technology. Because they are used to it, who initially did not prepare a laptop, now prepare. If you only rely on smartphones, it turns out that during the exam many people complain. At least have a laptop to be a handle for each other’s learning. Then we balance it by having a Certificate of Companion Diploma (SKPI) which they followed before graduating. For example, TOEFL, pass international certificates, Accurate Certificates and Taxes, etc. At least the supporting certificates such as PKM and Student Creativity Program, and others. We are optimistic as long as we are consistent.

Komunita: In 2030-2045 we face a demographic bonus, where there are more higher education, will the pandemic condition not turn into a demographic disaster?

Dr. Sugiyanto, M.Sc.: One of them we prepare it. Therefore, we are preparing other things, such as the government’s appeal, that the graduates approach towards entrepreneurship. The vision and mission of the IKOPIN Foundation were adjusted and others, including the university statutes, were also changed. We hope to get permission to become a University. The existing study programs are Social Sciences, but it must also be approached with technology science, data must be assessed and we use it. Likewise, intelligent knowledge must be utilized. This is a great investment for our institution. We have prepared graduates who are able to solve social problems with technology, knowledge and also a business approach. That should be done because that is where we can actually accommodate workers, seek added value, prosper the community, by providing goods and services, input and output can rotate. We assure all parties, especially lecturers and students. In time, hopefully there will be no lost generation, a demographic disaster.

Komunita: From your description above, it seems that the pandemic has accelerated the new balance of higher education, is that true?

Dr. Sugiyanto, M.Sc.: It’s true that the current conditions can be an interesting consideration. We need to find this balance, so the effort must have commitment from all parties, we must change. From all sides, the perception is equal so that each party has the same understanding, the management (foundation), lecturers, students and alumni. Curriculum improvements, changes in the vision and mission of the institution also invite alumni, and the government to provide input to our educational institutions. And we hope that the government has a stronger commitment, such as the Ministry of Education and Culture, as well as the Ministry of Cooperatives and SMEs, especially policies in developing cooperatives, must be a concern.

Such as the people’s economy and the small and medium economy need to be considered and brought forward again. Like the cattle breeders in Lembang or in Pangalengan, they can last for decades because of the cooperation. Then from the MBKM side (Development of the Independent Learning Curriculum-Independent Campus), we as PTS have started. Academic implementation of MBKM must run, and the steps that have been taken are to change the curriculum that is already running and has been communicated to all study programs. MBKM learning has been implemented in our universities. In fact, there have been many collaborations with cooperatives, both small and large. Also many cooperatives come to campus to ask for guidance. Field Practice courses are applied, identical to KKN when in other campuses. Our field practice in the Cooperative has only been for 2 months, and only 2 credits. With the development of the Merdeka Learning-Independence Campus curriculum, we applied it to 20 credits for Field Practice, with a change of name to Internship or Job Training. We also have a Business Incubator Center; we direct these entrepreneurship students there. If the Entrepreneurship Practice runs for 1 semester, it can become 20 credits (equivalent to 1 semester), then through cooperative practice, students must become members of the cooperative or cooperative management. This will bring up a new entrepreneurial and entrepreneurial spirit. This is the new balance we are aiming for.

Komunita: How is the relaxation policy during the pandemic given by the government?

Dr. Sugiyanto, M.Sc.: This is interesting sir, we thank the government. At the beginning of the pandemic, the government had helped student, lecturer study quotas and added KIP (Bidik Misi). Indeed, at the beginning of the pandemic, students had difficulty with Internet quotas and we had to cover the cost even though it was not enough. We hope that the next recipient of this assistance should not only be students. But PTS itself as the culprit should also be taken into account.

PTS organizes education means helping government programs. Higher education is mostly private, comes from public funds to organize it. The Government should also provide Education Assistance funds such as (BOS). However, what is given is actually things that make it difficult, for example for grants, research funds, because the private sector accreditation requirements are quite heavy. This should be obtained through the mechanism of the coach. We don’t demand more. For example, so that private universities are treated the same and it is easier to pursue achievements, it is enough to look at the number of lecturers. For example, 10 teams of lecturers get research to improve PTS performance. In fact, the government regulations are very high. PTS are prosecuted with burdensome rules from the government, while there is no financial support for the PTS. We really feel that sometimes we follow the rules, but suddenly they want to change again. This becomes an obstacle for PTS. We believe the accreditation requirements will lead to MBKM. Whereas MBKM also requires a special thought and cost, planning. We prepare special management to handle this.

Komunita: Hopes and Messages as the manager of Higher Education to the Organizing Committee, the Government of fellow PTS, as well as Lecturers and Students.

Dr. Sugiyanto, M.Sc.: It is hoped that optimal learning, learning outcomes and graduates will have maximum competence. This can be achieved with a shared commitment, namely us as administrators, lecturers, students and parents of students. We often discuss with the Organizing Body, so that there is a higher synergy regarding the management of higher education. To the Government, we expect fair treatment for PTS. Between the PTS classes that are the reference, it may need a certain tolerance, such as in research and grants. This means that PTS are given the opportunity first. Also, government policies should not change too quickly, we are having a hard time keeping up with them. For example, the same treatment between PTN and PTS.

Then fellow universities strengthen cooperation. For the Independent Learning Program, PTS cooperates with each other, including research, community service. We ourselves have collaborated with IPMI Jakarta, a management school that specializes in large capital companies, but the courses that are practiced to balance the competence of students, they do an internship in the Cooperative for up to 6 months. We also visited Widyatama to study accounting. This collaboration among universities must continue to be developed, such as joint research and CSR.

To parents of students in pandemic conditions like this, parental assistance is very valuable, especially to supervise their sons studying at home. Parents must understand their son’s class schedule, so that they can help remind them of lectures. For lecturers and students, we hope to be fully aware of this noble task, as a charity of worship. We emphasize that this practice is a shared commitment for students. For students, we give confidence that students will become leaders who need to prepare themselves, and show achievements. (Rewrite & Interview: Lili Irahali; Audio to Transcript: Yanda Ramadana)

THE CARE FOR THE QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE MIDDLE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

0

.

THE CARE FOR THE QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION

IN THE MIDDLE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

.

  The Covid-19 pandemic has resulted in the temporary physical closure of 4,586 campuses throughout Indonesia, around 8,848,816 students, and 295,219 lecturers have been affected by the Covid-19 pandemic, policy makers and universities are faced with unprecedented challenges. Such as how to reduce learning loss, how to implement online learning, how to safely reopen education and how to ensure underrepresented, vulnerable and disadvantaged students are not left behind.

  Higher education and campuses are actually places where students live and study close to each other. The campus is also a cultural center where students gather from various parts of Indonesia. However, now the foundation of this unique ecosystem has been significantly affected by the rapid spread of the coronavirus (Covid-19) outbreak, and has created uncertainty about its implications for higher education.

For almost the last 1.5 years, higher education has been forced to cancel face-to-face classes and close campus doors which are difficult to predict when they will end. Face-to-face learning on campus is being shifted to online learning, and students are encouraged to return home or at home to complete their studies. The real Covid-19 pandemic has resulted in a long-term disruption to the higher education system.

  Listening to the speech of Ugandan President, Kaguta Museveni that: “The world is currently at war. War without guns and bullets. ….. War without limits. …… The soldiers in this war are merciless. It doesn’t have a shred of humanity. Indiscriminately – it doesn’t matter whether children, women, or places of worship are attacked. ……. This is an invisible, fast, and highly effective army. The only agenda is the harvest of death. Only full after turning the world into one great death land. Its capacity to achieve its goals is unquestionable. ….. It has bases in almost every country in the world. Its movements are not governed by any conventions or war protocols. In short, it is a law unto itself. It is the Coronavirus. Also known as Covid-19.

Thankfully, these troops have weaknesses and can be defeated. It only requires our collective action, discipline and patience. Covid-19 cannot survive social and physical distancing. It only develops when you challenge it. …… But gave up in the face of collective social and physical distancing. …. Helpless when you take your destiny in your own hands by keeping it clean as often as possible. This is not the time to cry about bread and butter…. The Bible tells us that man will not live by bread alone (but by every Word of God). ….. Let’s flatten the Covid-19 curve. Let’s practice patience. Let’s be our brother’s keeper. ……”

  Indonesia has made various efforts and policies, including: the formation of task forces and task forces, implementation of health protocols, Covid-19 vaccination, PSBB, Emergency PPKM, PPKM levels 1 to 4 which are still being extended until this writing is compiled. All activities are restricted, including education which is an essential sector in educating the human resources of Indonesia’s young generation as an investment for the future. That’s the situation we’re in. Conditions that certainly encourage education to have new toughness and balance, because the demands of education must continue even with restrictions on health protocols.

Higher education institutions, such as universities and organizing commitee (Foundations) are indeed facing difficult times, due to the pandemic that cannot be controlled. This situation has been going on for almost 2 years, and there is no indication that it will end. Therefore, after all, the adaptation and resilience of universities must be developed by each higher education institution in response to the Covid-19 pandemic.

The views and research of Dr. Gleb Tsipursky can be important as a reinforcement for universities to carry out “self-transformation” in implementing quality higher education services during this Pandemic. As an illustration of the reality, we met several leaders of higher education organizers and managers – foundations and universities. Their perspective and attitude are seen as the front line of higher education in educating quality human resources during this pandemic.

Very encouraging, there is optimism, adaptability, creativity and innovation without stopping in their thoughts and steps to maintain the quality of learning and higher education. Indeed, at the beginning of the Pandemic, most of the higher education institutions experienced shocks in the midst of such a sudden event, but they are trying to get up.

Mangadar Situmorang, Ph.D. – – The Rector of Unpar (Community, ed.27) said the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic “forced” PT to accelerate digital technology (social meetings, learning videos, digital presentations). However, it should be noted that explaining a concept virtually, in terms of lectures, there are still many shortcomings in terms of the effectiveness of receiving material. There are some limitations of lecturers, in delivering incomplete material, psychological burden and uncomfortable social relations between lecturers and students. Several other factors regarding character education cannot be done. How to make an assessment in character development? When we make an evaluation or assessment through the Mid-Semester Examination (UTS), because it is done virtually, the lecturer does not supervise and does not check again.

All were left independently to students so that there were the same test results for several students (cheating). The student was given an E grade (did not pass one course) and failed one semester. It has to do with character development. But then, is it appropriate to give such punishment to students? When in the process itself there is no supervision from the lecturer, there is no instrument of supervision. Although they must be honest and have integrity in social relations. But when social relations don’t take place, isn’t that foolishness? On the one hand, we want them to be honest and have integrity, but on the other hand, we sometimes invite them to collaborate with their friends if there are things that they don’t understand.

The instruments are not yet ready, which can ensure the desired character education can run well. It is not only a matter of infrastructure that must be prepared, what is more important is an assessment both in terms of knowledge and character, as well as social relations.

From the social side, friends make research that leads to discovery even though it is not a new discovery. This further emphasizes that the community has the potential for what we call a capital culture to care for each other during a pandemic, because there are many layoffs, the economy stops. Our society spontaneously, culturally raises funds, aids and so on.

These researches were carried out as socio-cultural capital to maintain economic tolerance, helping from the marketing side. The Faculty of Economics provides assistance in creating an application to support their business. Regarding legal compliance or legal compliance or legal injury due to layoffs or because of normal contracts, suddenly a pandemic (including force majeure).

  Ir. A. Harits Nu’man, M.T., Ph.D., IPM. – Vice Rector I Unisba (Community, ed.27) views the Covid-19 pandemic and in the future requires an adequate digital transformation model (online learning) in terms of methods and quality of learning. In terms of online learning, universities and lecturers are actually required to innovate learning, changing learning methods that are more student-centered. Lecturers as motivators and prepare innovative teaching materials to be easily understood by students. While higher education prepares resources to support the learning process. Through this transformation, lecturers carry out synchronous learning (face-to-face in cyberspace/virtual) and also a-syncronous where students can study anytime and anywhere within a predetermined time period by fulfilling the elements of modules, forums, quizzes and assignments according to the requirements. Learning Plans that have been determined to meet the standards of Graduate Learning Outcomes.

Indeed, in 2020 before Covid-19 we had prepared an online system. The Information Systems and Management/SIM Unit at that time utilized the DIKTI Grant to develop. Online teaching began in 2017, online socialization in 2018, then strengthened by the Decree of the Foundation and the Rectorate as the regulation. Meanwhile, the Foundation fully supports strengthening infrastructure and human resources. However, this requires a process, and there is high retention, because many lecturers still prefer face-to-face rather than virtual. Because the Covid-19 pandemic is a force majore, we provide compensation to students and teaching lecturers. We compensate with the cost of pulses, electricity costs and others.

From the aspect of content and lecturer readiness. We mapped lecturers into 3 clusters, namely: Millennial Cluster, Semi Cluster, and Elderly Cluster. The problem is the burden on elderly educators. That’s why we made the transplant accompanied by young lecturers in preparing the material so that it can be implemented into the system. We continue to prepare this Human Capability with modules, forums, quizzes, and assignments. The four components refer to the RPS and the tasks that must be fulfilled are the obligation to perfect the Semester Learning Plan (RPS). Now, what is in the middle becomes leverage, and team teaching is formed by sharing materials and togetherness well.

Indeed, with the application of online learning, there are many dynamics that occur. From the lecturer’s side, there is unpreparedness, and the lecturer’s worries are replaced by technology. Changing this mindset is very difficult and requires a persuasive approach, it must also be continuous and gradual.

There are also some teaching conditions that are really difficult with online teaching. For example, the medical study program is the most difficult and requires feeling and touch that cannot be replaced by a cadaver with a statue. When face-to-face lectures require the application of health protocols, swabs, etc. which have implications for costs. We combine online and offline, and we also recommend swabs to lecturers and employees for free.

The wisdom of the Covid-19 pandemic, we are forced to always be literate, besides that our information system is tested with blended online teaching with face to face. In conclusion, technological developments from cultural products, accelerated by this pandemic, we as educators should always respond maturely, and deal with it with positive steps and teach it to students.

   Prof.Ir. Meilinda Nurbanasari, M.T., Ph. D – The Rector of ITENAS (Komunita, ed.27) stated that apart from the pandemic, Digital Transformation is a necessity. It’s not just a trend that’s happening because of the pandemic. Higher education must accommodate to be 100% implement like this. We are only running 60% due to fixes and changes. In terms of infrastructure, we bought a new server at a fairly expensive price, because during premium hours, lecturers (the highest hour of student activity) must simultaneously be able to log in to 2,000 students at the same time without server problems. We are continuously improving our large capacity server system. While in its implementation, lecturers and teaching staff are very empathetic to students, and vice versa because of limited quotas or other constraints on the Online Learning model. Indeed, the campus must improve the quality of online and interactive between lecturers and students.

  In addition to the learning process, it is not easy to educate students. We see online learning is 247, 24 hours a day 7 hours a week. This means that lecturers can access or assign assignments at any time, and students can access and ask questions at any time. But in fact not used to it like that. Virtual are more for asking questions (asynchronous), but what happens is synchronous, the schedule is offline but now online. Meanwhile, we implement such a system, the method is online but in the way of thinking it is still like offline, teaching only in front of a notebook with “virtual” faces.

  Indeed, educating lecturers and students needs to be gradual, while at the same time fixing the obstacles. Since the Covid-19 pandemic we have been providing online services, such as ordering books via online, and sending them to the student’s residential address. All lecturers must upload material in the Moodle application. If there is a link via youtube, another application must be included. This effort is expected that students read the material from the lecturer first. So when learning online (face to face) students have an initial picture of the course material.

Finally, all student service systems were made Management Information Systems, and to make it easier for final year students who were doing their thesis by facilitating access to learning, the session was also online, right. With the sudden change, we initially used the existing system. With this process, students must self-attend manually. When the online system is integrated with the higher education everything is smoother and more ready.

.

1.5 years of Pandemic Time

  The Covid-19 pandemic has been running for almost 1.5 years and has drained energy, eroded and degraded what universities have achieved, and changed social habits due to social distancing and lockdowns. So that digital becomes a public space that connects us with society. In this span of time, the perspective and behavior of higher education managers has grown in response to this pandemic. The pandemic that has not yet clearly ended has become the trigger and booster for “resileince” and “equilibrium” for higher education. The quality of response and adaptability to the Covid-19 pandemic should be able to improve, especially as a qualified professional. Higher education institutions should be able to adapt and plan better. As encouraged by Dr. Gleb Tsipursky in his book as mentioned.

  In response to this Dr. Cahyat Rohyana, S.E., M.M – Chairman of the Bhakti Pos Indonesia/YPBPI Education Foundation emphasized that the key word is “shifting behavior”. The pandemic is not a barrier, but the “opportunity” and momentum to foster initiatives that are able to solve various problems in this time of crisis. So, of course, encouraging higher education institutions to be innovative in the creative, flexible and tenacious learning process, by utilizing knowledge and technology as “enablers” and “transformers”, without reducing the quality of learning and the quality of graduates that we carry together. Because the end of education still has to produce human resources / graduate students who are able to continue to develop in line with the dynamics of the business and industrial world facing Industry 4.0.

Although there are weaknesses here and there will be a new learning model in the future. During a pandemic, maybe a new digitalization process like this. However, it turns out that there are positive things that can be developed in order to create a learning model which of course usually answers the next century which is strengthened by digital technology and other technology technologies. This means that we in public and private universities must be able to demonstrate good management and quality.

  In the same view, Dr. H. Asep Effendi, SE., M.Sc., PIA., CFrA., CRBC – The Rector of Sangga Buana University (USB) mentioned two main things in responding to the Covid-19 pandemic.

First, educational normative should have started to redesign how the system of assessment and assessment of success. In terms of the learning system, I think we are already in 2 (two) years or the second year. Initially, it was the same as other universities, experiencing a severe shock, when the lecturer changed learning from conventional to having to switch to an IT system or become an online lecture. It is not easy to teach new things, especially because of the relatively old age factor (our lecturers need their knowledge and experience). It’s a homework in itself. However, we are sure that during the Covid-19 pandemic and conventional learning, there are different methods, but the spirit is the same, such as educating students according to their competence and educating them. If the spirit is the same, want to run wherever the initial goal will be achieved.

Second, about governance. Higher education governance in the pandemic era includes 6 points of extraordinary change. Therefore, management and leadership are very important. We must have the tools to control. In this pandemic condition, students are also having a hard time, if they want to complain to whom? That’s what we do every week, by spiritually motivating lecturers and students. The seriousness of the leadership is to maintain the target of the quality of human resources in the future, therefore the government also has a stake in policy, more policies that provide freedom. Well, that’s where the freedom that universities can use to be competitive and adventurous, including the vision of entrepreneurs. That’s the mindset that must be developed in a situation like today.

Meanwhile, Dr. H. Sugiyanto, M.Sc.- Vice Rector for Academics, Student Affairs and Alumni IKOPIN (Indonesian Cooperative Management Institute) – Jatinangor stated that at the beginning of the Pandemic, higher education and universities were essential in maintaining the teaching and learning process that forced online learning. Even though most of the learning is still face-to-face. However, with the spirit of being perpendicular to the main goal of higher education, such as educating students, and future generations, he remains optimistic that the pandemic wave must be overcome with a positive attitude, and make adjustments and changes through creativity, innovation and cooperation.

We take the attitude that the challenges of the Pandemic are the triggers, and the drivers that awaken us to change. The key word is creative and proactive in dealing with the changes brought about by the Covid-19 Pandemic. One of them is utilizing technology, and establishing a new balance in the teaching and learning process in order to maintain the quality of the process, output and outcome, in this case the teaching and learning process and higher education graduates.

In this regard, the cooperation of all stakeholders is needed, not only educational institutions and (organizers and managers), lecturers, students, even parents. What inter-institutional higher education has been initiated by LLDikti IV West Java Banten should be developed. Moreover, the government must give equal space to all higher education institutions, both public and private.

  Those are the perspectives, attitudes, and policies of some of them as the front line of higher education in an effort to educate quality human resources during this pandemic. As a form of optimism for educators and educational institutions as an effort to build “resilience” and “new equilibrium” universities in carrying out their strategic roles. Hopefully.

Writer: lili irahali – August 6, 2021

Kemandirian Belajar Masa Pandemi: Ujian Bagi Indonesia dan Exit Strategy yang Tersedia

Kemandirian Belajar Masa Pandemi: Ujian Bagi Indonesia dan Exit Strategy yang Tersedia

Oleh: Bachrudin Musthafa, Guru Besar Literasi UPI Bandung

  Hiruk-pikuk kehidupan di seantero bumi ini tiba-tiba dibuat gaduh dan kemudian senyap oleh wabah berskala global yang kemudian kita kenal dengan istilah corona virus. Di Indonesia saja, sebagai contoh kasus, wabah yang telah merenggut jutaan nyawa sumberdaya manusia produktif ini telah menyentakkan kita dari apa yang selama ini kita impikan dan mungkin telah menjadi obsesi kita.

  Dalam suasana semacam ini Komunita menurunkan tajuk utama penting: “Pandemi Covid-19– Degradasi, Resiliensi dan Equibrium PT” dan “Merawat Kualitas Pendidikan Tinggi di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19”. Dibaca dengan cara menyandingkan kedua tajuk utama ini dalam satu halaman yang sama memaksa fokus perhatian kita membagi diri ke dalam dua tahapan. Tahap pertama mengaji dampak sapuan wabah terhadap keadaan kolektif kita sebagai negara-bangsa; tahap ke dua mereka-reka pemahaman terhadap keadaan dan kemudian berusaha merancang strategi untuk bangkit membangun kembali sumberdaya dan fasilitas yang masih tersisa.

  Menuruti alur pemahaman di atas, artikel singkat ini akan mengangkat beberapa catatan dan mengajukan sejumlah gagasan pemberdayaan agar kita sebagai negara-bangsa tidak “terkubur” dalam “mimpi buruk” yang membuat kita secara kolektif lemas dan tak berdaya.

  Pertama, sebagai basis bagi pemikitan kita bersama, ide-ide pokok dari narasumber yang dihadirkan Komunita akan diringkaskan, kemudian diikuti komentar reflektif agar gagasan penting yang dikatakannya dapat mengendap ke dalam kesadaran. Tokoh yang mendapatkan giliran bicara pada Komunitas edisi (Agustus/September 2021) ini termasuk Rektor Unpar (Prof. Situmorang, PhD), Prof. Harits Nu’man PhD. (Wakil Rektor Unisba), Prof. Meilinda Nurbanasari, PhD. (Rektor ITENAS), Dr. Cahyat Rohyana (Ketua YPBPI), Prof. Asep Effendi – Rektor Universitas Sangga Buana (USB), dan Dr. Sugianto (Wakil Rektor IKOPIN). Dari rektorat Unpar tercatat isu penting yang merisaukan terkait kualitas hasil belajar mahasiswa pada awal-awal pandemi ini mengesankan “seadanya” dan tanpa kedalaman. Dari pimpinan Unisba tercatat adanya tantangan “memelekkan teknologi” tenaga pengajar angkatan lama sekaitan dengan tuntutan kebutuhan menyediakan pembelajaran synchronous dan pengajaran a-syncronous karena kebutuhan diversifikasi pembelajaran yang dipaksa berubah oleh keadaan masa pandemi ini. Dari Rektor ITENAS terbaca tantangan besar dari sisi dana pengembangan untuk membuat kampus ini 100% digitalized dengan berbagai rentetan konsekuensi yang menyertainya. Pimpinan Yayasan Pendidikan Bhakti Pos Indonesia, dalam situasi pandemi yang melumpuhkan ini meyakini bahwa pendidikan harus mampu mengantarkan mahasiswanya sejalan dengan derap usaha dan dinamika industri menghadapi Industry 4.0. Sejalan dengan itu, Rektor Universitas Sangga Buana (USB) menghadapai tantangan ekstra penting dalam memastikan keajegan kompetensi lulusan yang hendak dicapai dan konsistensi tatakelola kepemimpinan perguruan tinggi. Terakhir, dari pimpinan IKOPIN tercatat gagasan dan tekad bahwa “pandemi adalah pemicu dan pemacu yang menyadarkan kita”: bahwa kita harus berubah ke arah yang lebih baik: lebih proaktif, kreatif, dan memberdayakan.

  Dari paparan gagasan pimpinan perguruan tinggi dan yayasan pengelola pendidikan yang menyertainya kita dapat menangkap dengan jelas bahwa—dalam ketakpastian sekalipun—layanan pendidikan harus tetap ditingkatkan dan dipastikan efektivitas dan efesiensinya.

  Bagaimana caranya? Itulah tantangan terbesar yang diakui para pimpinan perguruan tinggi yang merupakan narasumber Komunita kali ini.

  Sisa ruangan yang terbatas pada esei ini akan difokuskan pada gagasan pemberdayaan kemandirian sebagai cara strategis untuk membuat mahasiswa Indonesia mulai mengambil porsi tanggungjawab sebagai pembelajar yang menitipkan nasib-peruntungan masa depannya ke kampus-kampus yang dipilihnya sebagai tempat belajar. Dapatkah mahasiswa kita mengubah elan perjuangannya ke arah yang lebih mandiri, strategis, dan berdaya?

  Jawabnya positif asalkan persyaratan-persyaratan prosesnya dipenuhi. Di bawah ini beberapa keniscayaan yang telah terbukti mewujud dalam pengalaman dan pengamatan saya selama puluhan tahun mengajar di perguruan tinggi.

  Pertama, dari masa kanak-kanak, anak-anak Indonesia harus dibiasakan memilih dan belajar menghayati konsekuensi pilihannya. Hal ini berlaku untuk semua hal yang wajar untuk dijadikan pilihan. Tidak tersedia jalan pintas dan dilarang mengambil jalan melanggar hukum.

  Dari pengalaman beberapa puluh tahun mengajar di jenjang S1, jenjang S2, dan Jenjang S3 di beberapa perguruan tinggi di Bandung selama ini, setiap jenjang pembelajaran ini memiliki kelemahan yang beraneka dan kelemahan yang sangat menonjol adalah kemampuan memahami diri-sendiri, khususnya yang bertalian dengan apa yang diinginkannya dan apa yang telah dilakukan untuk mencapai apa yang diinginkannya. Misalnya, ketika hal ini dikontekstualisasikan ke dalam masalah “penelitian” masalah ini sangat kentara. Contoh: Riset apa yang ingin dilakukannya untuk projek skripsi untuk jenjang S1? Apa yang ingin diteliti untuk tugas akhir thesis jenjang S2 yang akan dilakukannya? Dan topik dan jenis riset apa yang ingin dilakukannya untuk penelitian disertasi S3 yang hendak diselesaikannya? Pertanyaan sederhana dan wajar ini, lebih dari 90 persennya tak dapat dijawab oleh mahasiswa di Indonesia.

  Kedua, berkaitan dengan kebiasaan memilih adalah pemberian opsi pilihan, utamanya ketika berhadapan dengan sesuatu keputusan penting semisal mau memiliki keahlian apa setamat kuliah nanti? Ingin memiliki keterampilan apa selepas mempelajari matakuliah tertentu nanti? Kebiasaan memilih semacam ini penting untuk menumbuhkan sense of direction yang merupakan prasyarat bagi kemampuan merencanakan sesuatu yang penting (being planful). Keterampilan “lunak” jenis ini strategis untuk dibekalkan kepada pembelajar/mahasiswa supaya mereka memiliki arah yang memandu geraknya dari momen yang satu ke momen yang lainnya.

  Ketiga, gambaran “orang baik” di kampus-kampus Indonesia perlu juga dikaji-ulang dan didefinisikan kembali. Mahasiswa yang baik itu seperti apa? Apa yang membuat seseorang menjadi mahasiswa teladan? Profil kepribadian seperti apa yang dianggap unggul di kampus-kampus di Indonesia? Seperti apa sifat, kebiasaan, dan kualitas etos kerja mahasiswa “teladan” yang membawanya sukses secara akademik dan sukes secara sosial?

  Hal ini sangat penting digarisbawahi bahwa nyaris semua hal yang berkaitan dengan atribut-atribut penting “keteladanan” seseorang itu dapat diciptakan dan bukan sifat bawaan adikodrati. Kalau kita dapat melihat semua ini sebagai masalah pilihan, maka semuanya menjadi “mungkin” dan menjadi “masalah pilihan”.

  Ke empat, akui bahwa ada faktor kecenderungan minat seseorang ke arah bidang tertentu dan kecenderungan itu dapat merupakan bonus penting bagi pilihan karir tertentu. Akan tetapi, seperti dikatakan Albert Einstein tempo doeloe, akhirnya kerjakeras akan mengalahkan bakat.

  Ke lima, anak-anak Indonesia—juga mahasiswa S1, S2, dan S3—harus sering diingatkan bahwa mereka, masing-masingnya, merupakan penentu utama yang akan menentukan masadepannya akan seperti apa, dan menjadi apa. Hal ini penting disadari bahwa, dalam banyak konteks, urut-urutan peringkat prestasi dalam banyak bidang masih terbuka untuk semua orang. Termasuk untuk mahasiswa S1, S2, dan S3 dari Indonesia.

  Selamat mengenali diri dan mengatur strategi pengembangan diri selagi hayat dikandung badan. Selamat menyibak jalan hijrah ke arah yang lebih baik dan berkah.

  Insya Allah berhasil.

*****

.

.

MERAWAT KUALITAS PENDIDIKAN TINGGI DITENGAH PANDEMI COVID-19

.

MERAWAT KUALITAS PENDIDIKAN TINGGI

DITENGAH PANDEMI COVID-19

.

  Pandemi Covid-19 telah mengakibatkan penutupan fisik sementara 4.586 kampus di seluruh Indonesia, sekitar 8,848,816 mahasiswa, dan 295,219 dosen telah terdampak pandemi Covid-19, pembuat kebijakan dan perguruan tinggi dihadapkan dengan tantangan yang belum pernah terjadi sebelumnya. Semisal bagaimana mengurangi kehilangan pembelajaran, cara menerapkan pembelajaran online, cara membuka kembali pendidikan dengan aman dan bagaimana memastikan mahasiswa yang kurang terwakili, rentan dan kurang beruntung tidak tertinggal.

  Perguruan tinggi (PT) dan kampus sejatinya juga tempat di mana mahasiswa tinggal dan belajar dekat satu sama lain. Kampus juga merupakan pusat budaya di mana mahasiswa berkumpul dari berbagai daerah Indonesia. Namun, kini fondasi ekosistem unik ini telah dipengaruhi secara signifikan oleh penyebaran cepat wabah virus corona (Covid-19), dan menciptakan ketidakpastian mengenai implikasinya bagi pendidikan tinggi.

  Selama hampir 1.5 tahun terakhir, PT terpaksa membatalkan kelas tatap muka dan menutup pintu kampus yang sulit diperkirakan kapan berakhir. Pembelajaran tatap muka di kampus dialihkan ke pembelajaran online, dan mahasiswa didorong pulang kampung atau di rumah untuk menyelesaikan studi mereka. Pandemi Covid-19 nyata telah mengakibatkan gangguan jangka panjang pada sistem pendidikan tinggi.

  Menyimak pidato Presiden Uganda, Kaguta Museveni bahwa: “Dunia saat ini sedang berperang. Perang tanpa senjata dan peluru. ….. Perang tanpa batas. …… Tentara dalam perang ini tanpa ampun. Tidak memiliki setitik pun rasa kemanusiaan. Tidak pandang bulu – tidak peduli apakah anak-anak, wanita, atau tempat ibadah yang diserangnya. ……. Ini adalah tentara yang tidak terlihat, cepat, dan sangat efektif. Agenda satu-satunya panen kematian. Hanya kenyang setelah mengubah dunia menjadi satu lahan kematian besar. Kapasitasnya untuk mencapai tujuannya tidak diragukan lagi. ….. Ia memiliki pangkalan di hampir setiap negara di dunia. Pergerakannya tidak diatur oleh konvensi atau protokol perang apa pun. Singkatnya, ia adalah hukumnya tersendiri. Ia adalah Coronavirus. Juga dikenal sebagai Covid-19.

  Syukurlah, pasukan ini memiliki kelemahan dan bisa dikalahkan. Hanya membutuhkan tindakan kolektif, disiplin dan kesabaran kita. Covid-19 tidak dapat bertahan dari jarak sosial dan fisik. Ia hanya berkembang ketika Anda menantangnya. …… Namun menyerah dalam menghadapi jarak sosial dan fisik kolektif. …. Tidak berdaya ketika Anda mengambil takdir Anda di tangan Anda sendiri dengan menjaganya tetap bersih sesering mungkin. Ini bukan waktunya untuk menangis tentang roti dan mentega…….. Kitab suci mengatakan kepada kita bahwa manusia tidak akan hidup dari roti saja (tetapi dari setiap Firman Allah). ….. Mari kita ratakan kurva Covid-19. Mari melatih kesabaran. Mari menjadi penjaga saudara kita. ……”

  Indonesia telah melakukan berbagai upaya dan kebijakan, diantaranya: pembentukan gugus tugas dan satuan tugas, penerapan protokol kesehatan, vaksinasi Covid-19, PSBB, PPKM Darurat, PPKM level 1 sampai dengan 4 yang masih diperpanjang sampai tulisan ini disusun. Semua kegiatan dibatasi, termasuk pendidikan yang merupakan sektor esensial dalam mendidik sumber daya manusia generasi muda Indonesia sebagai investasi masa depan. Itulah suasana yang kita hadapi. Kondisi yang tentunya mendorong pendidikan memiliki ketangguhan dan keseimbangan baru, karena tuntutan pendidikan harus tetap berjalan walaupun dengan pembatasan protokol kesehatan sekalipun.

  Institusi pendidikan tinggi, yakni perguruan tinggi (PT) serta badan penyelenggara (Yayasan) memang sedang menghadapi masa-masa sulit, akibat pandemi belum bisa dikendalikan. Hampir 2 tahun situasi ini berlangsung, dan juga belum ada gambaran akan berakhir. Karena itu, bagaimanapun juga adaptasi dan ketahanan diri PT harus ditumbuh-kembangkan oleh masing-masing institusi pendidikan tinggi mensikapi pandemi Covid-19 ini.

  Pandangan dan penelitian Dr. Gleb Tsipursky bisa jadi penting sebagai penguat PT melaksanakan “transformasi diri” melaksanakan layanan pendidikan tinggi berkualitas di masa Pandemi ini. Sebagai gambaran realitas, kami menemui beberapa pimpinan penyelenggara dan pengelola pendidikan tinggi – yayasan dan perguruan tinggi. Tampak perspektif dan sikap mereka sebagai garda terdepan pendidikan tinggi dalam mendidik sumber daya manusia yang berkualitas di masa pandemi ini.

  Sangat menggembirakan, hadir optimisme, adaptabilitas, kreativitas dan inovasi tanpa henti dalam pemikiran dan langkah mereka menjaga kualitas pembelajaran dan pendidikan tinggi. Memang, di awal Pandemi sebagian besar institusi pendidikan tinggi mengalami guncangan di tengah peristiwa yang begitu tiba-tiba tersebut, namun berusaha bangkit.

  Mangadar Situmorang, Ph.D. – Rektor Unpar (Komunita, ed.27) mengatakan awal Pandemi Covid-19 “memaksa” PT melakukan percepatan teknologi digital (social meeting, video pembelajaran, presentasi digital). Namun, patut diperhatikan menjelaskan suatu konsep secara virtual, dari sisi perkuliahan masih banyak kekurangan dalam hal efektifitas penerimaan materi. Ada beberapa keterbatasan dosen, dalam penyampaian materi yang tidak lengkap, adanya beban psikologis dan relasi sosial antar dosen dan mahasiswa yang tidak nyaman. Beberapa faktor lain mengenai pendidikan karakter tidak dapat dilakukan. Bagaimana cara membuat assesment dalam pengembangan karakter tersebut. Ketika kita membuat evaluasi atau assesment melalui Ujian Tengah Semester (UTS), karena dilakukan secara virtual, dosen tidak mengawasi dan tidak memeriksa lagi.

  Semua diserahkan mandiri kepada mahasiswa sehingga ada terjadi hasil ujian yang sama pada beberapa mahasiswa (kecurangan karena mencontek satu sama lain). Mahasiswa tersebut diberikan nilai E (tidak lulus satu mata kuliah) dan gagal satu semester. Ini kaitan dengan pengembangan karakter. Tapi kemudian, layakkah memberikan hukuman tersebut kepada mahasiswa? Ketika pada prosesnya sendiri tidak ada pengawasan dari dosen, tidak ada instrumen pengawasan. Meskipun mereka harus jujur dan berintegritas dalam relasi sosial. Namun ketika relasi sosial tidak berlangsung, bukankah itu menjadi suatu kebodohan? Di satu sisi ingin mereka jujur dan berintegritas, namun di sisi lain kadang kita mempersilakan mereka untuk berkolaborasi dengan temannya jika ada hal-hal yang tidak dapat dimengerti.

  Instrumen-instrumen belum siap, yang bisa memastikan pendidikan karakter yang diinginkan bisa berjalan dengan baik. Bukan saja soal infrastruktur yang harus dipersiapkan, yang lebih penting adalah assesment baik dari sisi pengetahuan dan karakter, serta relasi sosial.

  Dari sisi sosial, teman-teman membuat riset yang bermuara pada penemuan meskipun bukan penemuan baru. Ini lebih menegaskan bahwa masyarakat punya potensi yang kita sebut capital culture untuk saling peduli satu sama lain di masa pandemi, karena banyak terjadi PHK, ekonomi berhenti. Masyarakat kita secara spontan, secara kultural mengumpulkan dana, bantuan dan sebagainya.

  Riset-riset itu dilakukan sebagai modal sosial kultural menjaga toleransi ekonomi membantu dari sisi pemasaran. Fakultas Ekonomi melakukan pendampingan meng-create sebuah aplikasi untuk mendukung usaha mereka. Soal kepatuhan hukum atau ketaatan hukum atau cedera hukum karena PHK atau karena kontrak-kontrak normal tadi, tiba-tiba pandemi (termasuk force majeur).

  Ir. A. Harits Nu’man, M.T., Ph.D., IPM. – Wakil Rektor I Unisba (Komunita, ed.27) memandang Pandemi Covid-19 dan ke depan memerlukan model transformasi digital (pembelajaran daring) yang memadai dari sisi metode maupun kualitas pembelajaran. Dalam hal pembelajaran daring, sesungguhnya PT dan juga dosen dituntut untuk melakukan inovasi pembelajaran, mengubah metode pembelajaran yang lebih berpusat pada mahasiswa. Dosen sebagai motivator dan menyiapkan bahan ajar yang inovatif untuk mudah dipahami mahasiswa. Sedang PT menyiapkan sumberdaya untuk mendukung proses pembelajaran tersebut. Melalui transformasi ini, maka dosen melakukan pembelajaran syncronous (tatap muka di dunia maya/virtual) dan juga a-syncronous dimana mahasiswa dapat belajar kapan saja dan dimana saja dalam kurun waktu yang telah ditetapkan dengan memenuhi unsur modul, forum, kuis dan tugas sesuai dengan Rencana Pembelajaran yang telah ditetapkan agar memenuhi standard Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan.

  Memang tahun 2020 sebelum Covid-19 kami sudah menyiapkan sistem daring. Unit Sistem Informasi dan Management/SIM ketika itu memanfaatkan Hibah DIKTI mengembangkan. Pengajaran daring mulai tahun 2017, sosialisasi daring tahun 2018, lalu diperkuat SK Yayasan dan Rektorat sebagai regulasinya. Sedang Yayasan mendukung penuh menguatkan infrastruktur dan sumber daya manusia. Namun hal tersebut memerlukan proses, dan ada retensi tinggi, karena banyak dosen masih lebih senang tatap muka daripada tatap maya. Karena Pandemi Covid-19 adalah force majore, maka kami memberikan kompensasi kepada mahasiswa dan dosen-dosen pengajar. Kami mengkompensasi dengan biaya pulsa, biaya listrik dan lainnya.

  Dari aspek konten dan kesiapan dosen. Kami petakan dosen dalam 3 cluster, yaitu: Cluster Milenial, Cluster Semi, dan Cluster Usia lanjut. Kendalanya, beban pada tenaga pendidik usia lanjut. Karena itu kami membuat pencangkokan didampingi dosen muda dalam mempersiapkan materi agar dapat diimplementasi ke sistem. Human Capability ini terus kami persiapkan dengan modul, Forum, Quiz, dan Tugas. Empat komponen tersebut merujuk pada RPS dan tugas-tugas yang harus dipenuhi adalah kewajiban dalam menyempurnakan RPS. Nah, yang di middle ini menjadi daya ungkit, dan terbentuklah team teaching dengan berbagi materi dan kebersamaan dengan baik.

  Memang dengan penerapan pembelajaran daring banyak dinamika yang terjadi. Dari sisi dosen ada ketidaksiapan, serta kekhawatiran dosen tergantikan oleh teknologi. Merubah pola pikir ini sangat sulit dan memerlukan pendekatan persuasif, juga harus terus menerus dan perlahan-lahan.

  Juga ada beberapa kondisi pengajaran yang memang sulit dengan pengajaran daring. Semisal program studi Kedokteran, paling sulit dan membutuhkan feeling and touch yang tidak bisa digantikan dari cadever dengan patung. Ketika kuliah tatap muka membutuhkan penerapan protokol kesehatan, swab dsb yang berimplikasi pada biaya. Kami mengkombinasikan antara daring dan juga offline, dan juga kami menyarankan swab pada dosen dan karyawan secara gratis.

  Hikmah pandemi Covid-19, kami dipaksa untuk senantiasa melek, selain itu sistem informasi kami teruji dengan pengajaran daring blended dengan tatap muka. Kesimpulannya perkembangan teknologi dari hasil budaya, dipercepat dengan pandemi ini, seharusnya kita sebagai pendidik senantiasa mensikapi secara dewasa, serta menghadapinya dengan langkah-langkah positif dan mengajarkannya kepada peserta didik.

  Prof. Ir. Meilinda Nurbanasari, M.T., Ph. D – Rektor ITENAS (Komunita, ed.27) menyatakan terlepas dari pandemi, Transformasi Digital adalah tuntutan. Bukan hanya trend yang terjadi karena pandemi. PT harus mengakomodir menjadi 100% menerapkan seperti ini. Kami baru menjalankan 60% karena adanya perbaikan dan perubahan. Dari segi infrastruktur kami membeli server baru dengan harga lumayan mahal, karena pada saat jam premium dosen (jam tertinggi aktifitas mahasiswa) harus serentak dapat di-log in sejumlah 2.000 mahasiswa dalam waktu yang bersamaan tanpa kendala server. Kami terus memperbaiki sistem server kapasitas yang besar. Sedang dalam implementasinya, dosen dan tenaga pengajar sangat dituntut berempati terhadap mahasiswa, juga sebaliknya karena keterbatasan quota ataupun kendala lainnya model Online Learning. Memang kampus harus meningkatkan kualitas online dan lebih interaktif antara dosen dengan mahasiswa.

  Selain proses pembelajaran, memang tidak mudah mengedukasi mahasiswa. Kita lihat pembelajaran daring adalah 247, 24 jam sehari 7 jam satu minggu. Artinya dosen kapanpun dapat mengakses atau memberikan tugas, dan mahasiswa dapat mengakses dan bertanya kapanpun. Namun nyatanya belum terbiasa seperti itu. Tatap maya lebih untuk mengajukan pertanyaan (asynchronous), tapi yang terjadi adalah synchronous, jadwal offline tapi sekarang online. Sementara, kami menerapkan sistem seperti itu, metodanya online tapi dalam cara berfikirnya masih seperti offline, mengajar hanya di depan laptop dengan wajah-wajah “maya”.

  Memang mengedukasi dosen dan juga mahasiswa perlu bertahap, sekaligus memperbaiki kendala-kendalanya. Semenjak pandemi Covid-19 kami melakukan pelayanan online, seperti pemesanan buku via online, dan dikirimkan ke alamat tempat tinggal mahasiswa. Semua dosen harus meng-upload materi di aplikasi Moodle. Apabila ada link via youtube, aplikasi lain harus disertakan. Upaya ini dengan harapan mahasiswa membaca materi dari dosen terlebih dahulu. Jadi ketika pembelajaran online (tatap maya) mahasiswa mempunyai gambaran awal tentang materi kuliahnya.

  Akhirnya semua sistem pelayanan mahasiswa dibuat Sistem Informasi Manajemen, dan untuk memudahkan mahasiswa tingkat akhir yang sedang skripsi dengan mempermudah akses pembelajaran, juga sidang di online kan. Dengan perubahan yang mendadak awalnya kami mengunakan sistem yang ada. Dengan proses ini mahasiswa harus self attendance secara manual. Ketika sistem online terintegrasi dengan PT semua lebih lancar dan lebih siap.

1,5 tahun Masa Pandemi

  Pandemi Covid-19 telah berjalan hampir 1.5 tahun dan telah menguras energi, menggerus dan mendegradasi apa yang telah dicapai perguruan tinggi, serta mengubah kebiasaan sosial karena social distancing dan lockdown. Sehingga digital menjadi ruang publik yang mengaitkan kita dengan masyarakat. Dalam rentang waktu berjalan tersebut perspektif dan perilaku pengelola pendidikan tinggi makin berkembang mensikapi Pandemi ini. Pandemi yang belum jelas berakhirnya menjadi pemicu dan pemacu “resileince” dan “equilibrium” PT. Kualitas respon dan adaptabilitas terhadap Pandemi Covid-19 seharusnya dapat meningkat, terutama sebagai profesional yang berkualitas. Institusi pendidikan tinggi selayaknya bisa beradaptasi serta merencanakan lebih baik. Sebagaimana yang didorong Dr. Gleb Tsipursky dalam bukunya sebagaimana disebutkan.

  Mensikapi hal tersebut Dr. Cahyat Rohyana, S.E., M.M – Ketua Yayasan Pendidikan Bhakti Pos Indonesia/YPBPI menegaskan kata kuncinya adalah “shifting behavior”. Pandemi bukan pembatas, namun “opportunity” dan momentum menumbuhkan inisiatif-inisiatif yang mampu memecahkan berbagai masalah di masa krisis ini. Sehingga tentunya mendorong lembaga pendidikan tinggi bersikap inovatif dalam proses pembelajaran kreatif, luwes dan ulet, dengan memanfaatkan pengetahuan dan teknologi sebagai “enabler” dan “transformer”, tanpa mengurangi kualitas pembelajaran dan mutu lulusan yang kita usung bersama. Karena ujung akhir pendidikan tetap harus menghasilkan sumber daya manusia/lulusan pembelajar yang mampu terus berkembang sejalan dengan dinamika dunia usaha dan industri menghadapi Industri 4.0.

  Walaupun ada kelemahan sana-sini akan menjadi model pembelajaran baru ke depan. Di masa pandemi mungkin proses digitalisasi baru seperti ini? Namun ternyata hal-hal positif yang bisa dikembangkan dalam rangka menciptakan model pembelajaran yang tentu bisanya menjawab abad mendatang yang dikuatkan dengan teknologi digital dan teknologi teknologi yang lain. Artinya kita di perguruan tinggi negeri dan swasta harus bisa menunjukkan penyelenggaraan dan kualitas yang baik.

  Dengan nada sama, Dr. H. Asep Effendi, SE., M.Si., PIA., CFrA., CRBC – Rektor Universitas Sangga Buana (USB) menyebutkan dua hal utama menyikapi kondisi Pandemi Covid-19.

  Pertama, normatif pendidikan harusnya sudah mulai merancang ulang bagaimana sistem penilaian dan penilaian keberhasilan. Kalau sistem pembelajaran saya pikir kita sudah masuk di 2 (dua) tahun atau tahun kedua. Awalnya sama dengan PT lain, mengalami shock berat, ketika dosen mengubah pembelajaran dari konvensional harus beralih ke IT System atau menjadi kuliah online. Tidak mudah mengedukasi hal baru, terutama karena faktor usia relatif sepuh (dosen kita yang dibutuhkan keilmuannya, dan pengalamannya). Itu menjadi pekerjaan rumah tersendiri. Namun kita yakin, pembelajaran di masa pandemi Covid-19 dan konvensional memang beda metode, tetapi ruhnya sama, yaitu mendidik peserta didik sesuai dengan kompetensi dan mencerdaskan mereka. Jika ruhnya sudah sama, mau lari kemana pun tujuan awal itu akan tercapai.

  Kedua, tentang tata kelola. Tata kelola perguruan tinggi di era pandemi mencakup 6 point perubahan yang luar biasa. Karena itu, Manajemen dan kepemimpinan itu sangat penting. Kita harus punya tools untuk mengontrol. Kondisi pandemi ini mahasiswa juga kesulitan, jika ingin mengeluh kepada siapa? Itulah yang setiap minggu kita olah, dengan memotivasi spiritual kepada dosen dan mahasiswa. Keseriusan pimpinan adalah menjaga target kualitas SDM di masa yang akan datang, karena itu pemerintah pun memiliki andil dalam kebijakan, lebih banyak kebijakan yang memberikan kebebasan. Nah, disitulah kebebasan yang bisa dimanfaatkan perguruan tinggi untuk menjadi kompetitif dan advantif, termasuk visi entrepreneur. Itulah pola pikir yang harus dikembangkan di situasi seperti sekarang ini.

  Sementara, Dr. H. Sugiyanto, M.Sc.– Wakil Rektor Akademik, Kemahasiswaan dan Alumni IKOPIN (Institut Manajemen Koperasi Indonesia) – Jatinangor menyatakan diawal Pandemi menjadikan pendidikan tinggi dan perguruan tinggi pontang panting dalam menjaga proses belajar mengajar yang memaksa pembelajaran secara daring. Padahal sebagian besar pembelajaran masih berbasis tatap muka. Namun dengan semangat tegak lurus dengan tujuan utama pendidikan tinggi, yakni mencerdaskan peserta didik, dan generasi mendatang ia tetap optimis bahwa gelombang Pandemi harus diatasi dengan sikap positif, serta melakukan penyesuaian dan perubahan melalui kreatifitas, inovasi dan kerjasama.

  Kami bersikap bahwa tantangan Pandemi adalah pemicu, dan pemacu yang menyadarkan kita untuk berubah. Kata kunci adalah kreatif dan proaktif menghadapi perubahan yang diungkit oleh Pandemi Covid-19. Salah satunya memanfaatkan teknologi, serta menetapkan keseimbangan baru dalam dalam proses belajar mengajar agar tetap menjaga kualitas proses, output dan outcome, dalam hal ini proses belajar mengajar dan lulusan pendidikan tinggi.

  Dalam kaitan itu dibutuhkan kerjasama semua pemangku kepentingan, tidak saja lembaga pendidikan dan (penyelenggara dan pengelola), dosen, mahasiswa, bahkan orang tua. Antar lembaga pendidikan tinggi apa yang sudah diinisiasi oleh LLDikti IV Jabar Banten selayaknya dikembangkan. Lebih-lebih pemerintah harus memberi ruang yang sama kepada semua lembaga pendidikan tinggi, baik negeri maupun swasta.

  Itulah perspektif, sikap, serta kebijakan sebagian mereka sebagai garda terdepan pendidikan tinggi dalam upaya mendidik sumber daya manusia yang berkualitas di masa pandemi ini. Sebagai bentuk optimisme para pendidik dan intitusi pendidikan sebagai upaya membangun “resilience” dan “new equilibrium” perguruan tinggi dalam menjalankan peran strategisnya. Semoga.

Writer: lili irahali – 6 Agustus 2021

Pandemi Covid-19 – Degradasi, Resiliensi dan Equilibrium PT ?

Pandemi Covid-19 – Degradasi, Resiliensi dan Equilibrium PT ?

Sidang Pembaca yang budiman,

            Tahun 1665, Universitas Cambridge (Trinity College Cambridge) ditutup karena wabah “maut hitam” (The Great Plague) melanda London. Isaac Newton seorang mahasiswa berusia 20 tahun menerima gelar sarjana pada Januari 1665 tepat saat wabah melanda London. Universitas Cambridge ditutup pada 7 Agustus 1665 dan mendorong para cendekiawan residennya pindah ke pedesaan yang berpenduduk kurang padat. Newton kembali ke pertanian keluarganya di Woolsthrope Manor sampai Universitas dibuka kembali pada akhir 1666.

Suatu hari, dia duduk di taman, dan melihat apel jatuh yang menginspirasinya merumuskan “teori gravitasi universal”. Dia memberi tahu William Stukeley agar memasukkan anekdot tersebut dalam biografinya yang akan diterbitkan setelah ia meninggal (Stukeley, 1752). Masa-masa itu menjadi masa produktif Newton dalam pengembangan ilmu optik dan cahaya, kalkulus, serta hukum gerak dan gravitasi.

Moral cerita ini adalah sejauh apapun lembaga pendidikan harus ditutup karena pandemi, kegiatan akademik seharusnya tetap berjalan, dimana ada roh yang senantiasa berkomitmen pada ilmu pengetahuan, pendidikan dan pelatihan disitulah pembangunan berkeadaban berlangsung.

Merujuk pada pemikiran James R. Davis dan Adelaide B. Davis, mahasiswa atau (lulusan PT) bukan hanya belajar untuk mengetahui, namun menjadi manusia pembelajar, yakni mereka harus mampu mengembangkan cara pikir dan memecahkan masalah. Karena, manusia pembelajar akan belajar dan mengembangkan ilmu tidak hanya di bangku kuliah, juga dalam pengalaman dan realitas kehidupan sebenarnya. Manusia pembelajar juga tidak diukur dari gelar dan atribut lahiriah yang dimiliki, tapi dari mental dan karakternya, serta dari kontribusi untuk kemajuan ilmu dan peradaban.

Benar adanya, sebuah ujung akhir pendidikan tinggi formal harus menghasilkan sumber daya manusia/lulusan pembelajar yang “mampu terus berkembang” mencari solusi problem-problem masyarakat, serta sejalan dengan dinamika dunia usaha dan industri menghadapi Industri 4.0, serta Society 5.0.

Pandemi Covid-19 yang berjalan 1,5 (satu setengah) tahun telah menguras energi, menggerus dan mendegradasi apa yang telah kita capai, termasuk pendidikan tinggi. Bahkan mungkin masih dibutuhkan nafas lebih panjang dalam menghadapinya. Pandemi mengubah kebiasaan sosial karena social distancing, lockdown, serta protokol kesehatan sehingga digital menjadi salah satu ruang publik yang mengaitkan kita dengan masyarakat. Sisi lain, Pandemi tersebut menguji aspek kepemimpinan begitu berat tanpa ada contoh sebelumnya. Lebih jauh dalam pandangan positif, Pandemi sesungguhnya menciptakan equilibrium sebagai proses keberkahan Illahi. Yakni tercipta suatu keadaan dimana interaksi yang terjadi antara komponen-komponen yang ada di dalam aktivitas hidup manusia tetap dan dapat berjalan secara harmonis dan juga berimbang, serta memberikan dampak yang signifikan terhadap kesejahteraan umat manusia ke depan.

Pandemi secara nyata telah memberi dampak terhadap aktor pendidikan tinggi yakni: mahasiswa, dosen, tenaga non pendidik, serta institusi pendidikan tinggi, pimpinan perguruan tinggi dan yayasan, bahkan sistem pendidikan secara keseluruhan. Bagi institusi pendidikan tinggi pandemi yang terjadi tiba-tiba, dan di sebagian besar kasus tidak ada rencana darurat selain mencoba melanjutkan pembelajaran jarak jauh. Pandemi telah menambah tingkat kerumitan pada pendidikan tinggi. Apalagi beberapa tantangan yang selama ini belum terselesaikan seperti kualitas pendidikan, ketimpangan akses dan pencapaian, relevansi lulusan, dan kini hilangnya pembiayaan publik secara progresif. Karena itu penting bagi kita untuk mulai membuat konsep jalan keluar dari krisis ini, serta memastikan tingkat inklusi dan kesetaraan setinggi mungkin. Lalu bagaimana tindakan institusi pendidikan tinggi tetap menjamin hak masyarakat atas pendidikan tinggi selama pandemi dan pasca pandemi.

Kata kunci adalah “shifting behavior”, “leadership reset”. Pandemi bukan pembatas, namun “opportunity” dan momentum menumbuhkan inisiatif-inisiatif yang mampu memecahkan berbagai masalah di masa krisis ini. Sehingga tentunya mendorong institusi pendidikan tinggi bersikap inovatif dalam dalam menerapkan pola kepemimpinan; serta proses pembelajaran kreatif, luwes dan ulet, dengan salah satunya memanfaatkan pengetahuan dan teknologi sebagai “enabler” dan “transformer”. Perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi kini sangat memungkinkan untuk hal tersebut.

Demikian pula, menguatkan kerjasama dan kolaborasi lintas perguruan tinggi dan sektor terkait, lintas ilmu, lintas pelaku dengan tanpa mengurangi kualitas pembelajaran dan mutu lulusan yang kita usung bersama. Kerjasama adalah kebutuhan perguruan tinggi untuk meningkatkan mutu “Tri Dharma Perguruan Tinggi” meliputi bidang pembelajaran, penelitian, dan pengabdian masyarakat walau dibatasi pandemi. Kerjasama memiliki fungsi penguatan kualitas pembelajaran, kualitas penelitian, serta kualitas pengabdian pada masyarakat seiring perubahan global pendidikan tinggi.

Apakah ini terus mewujud? Memang perlu kajian mendalam. Namun dari dialog dan pengamatan dengan beberapa penyelenggara, pengelola dan komunitas pendidikan tinggi, dapat diserap sebuah  optimisme untuk senantiasa bangkit dan menjawab pandemi dengan solusi-solusi terbaik sesuai kondisi masing-masing lembaga pendidikan tinggi, demi mengusung peningkatan kualitas SDM. Itulah amanah jiwa-jiwa para pendidik.

Tampak bisa ditangkap alternatif solusi adalah perlu mengatur ulang pola kepemimpinan, serta memanfaatkan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi sehingga memicu dan memacu perguruan tinggi mewujudkan transformasi diri. Dalam aspek kepemimpinan, pola kepemimpinan perguruan tinggi perlu responsif terhadap keadaan paling mutakhir, serta mengatur ulang peran kepemimpinan dalam menghadapi pandemi dan normal baru. Pandemi Covid-19 nampaknya masih belum terprediksi, sehingga membutuhkan ketahanan. Sebagaimana tulisan Gleb Tsipursky 8 Mei 2020 lalu menyebut dengan jelas kata “Ketahanan” (Resilience) dalam adaptasi kebiasaan baru Pandemi Covid-19. Gleb Tsipursky mengurai strategi berbasis penelitian tentang bagaimana organisasi dan individu dapat beradaptasi secara efektif dengan New Abnormal dan bencana serupa. Ia menunjukkan bagaimana mengembangkan rencana strategis yang efektif dan membuat keputusan besar terbaik dalam konteks ketidakpastian dan ambiguitas yang ditimbulkan Pandemi Covid-19 dan bencana skala besar yang bergerak lambat dalam bukunya Resilience: Adapt and Plan for the New Abnormal of the Covid-19 Coronavirus Pandemic.

Sedang dalam aspek ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi salah satunya teknologi digital yang tersedia perlu dioptimasi, dengan tanpa mengurangi karakteristik profil lulusan, karakteristik pembelajaran dan prosesnya, karakteristik peserta didik, serta tujuan pendidikan itu sendiri.

Bagi perguruan tinggi swasta/PTS, baik badan penyelenggara (Yayasan) maupun badan pengelola (Perguruan Tinggi) merasakan tekanan yang sangat berat. Namun apapun perlu diwujudkan agar tetap mampu bertahan dan menciptakan equilibrium baru sebagai keberkahan Illahi dalam menjalankan peran sebagai lembaga pencerdas anak bangsa. Mari kita wujudkan bersama. Wallahualam.

Vivat Widyatama, Vivat Civitas Academica, Vivat Indonesia dan Nusantara tercinta. (@lee)

Redaksi – Lili Irahali

test

0

test

STRATEGI MARKETING BAGI UMKM

KeniK (2)

.

STRATEGI MARKETING BAGI UMKM

Keni Kaniawati

  Ketika suatu negara memasuki era Revolusi Industri 4.0, pertumbuhan industri cenderung menyeluruh dan sustainable, oleh karena itu ada empat langkah strategis agar Indonesia mengimplementasikan Industry 4.0 yaitu :

1.Mendorong agar angkatan kerja di Indonesia terus belajar dan meningkatkan ketrampilannya untuk memahami penggunaan teknologi internet of things atau mengintregasikan kemampuan internet dengan lini produksi di industri.
2.Pemanfaatan teknologi digital untuk memacu produktivitas dan daya saing bagi industri kecil dan menengah (IKM) sehingga mampu menembus pasar ekspor melalui program e-smart  IKM. Program e-smart  IKM ini merupakan upaya juga memperluas pasar dalam rantai nilai dunia dan menghadapi era Industry 4.0.
3.Industri nasional dapat menggunakan teknologi digital seperti Big Data, Autonomous Robots, Cybersecurity, Cloud, dan Augmented Reality.  Sistem Industry 4.0  ini akan memberikan keuntungan bagi industri.
4.Perlunya inovasi teknologi melalui pengembangan startup dengan memfasilitasi tempat inkubasi bisnis. Upaya ini telah dilakukan Kementerian Perindustrian dengan mendorong penciptaan wirausaha berbasis teknologi yang dihasilkan dari beberapa technopark yang dibangun di beberapa wilayah di Indonesia, seperti di Bandung (Bandung Techno Park), Denpasar (TohpaTI Center), Semarang (Incubator Business Center Semarang), Makassar (Makassar Techno Park – Rumah Software Indonesia), dan Batam (Pusat Desain Ponsel).

  Perkembangan teknologi digital dan internet telah memberikan dampak yang begitu signifikan terhadap masyarakat global, tak terkecuali masyarakat Indonesia. Bahkan internet sudah menjadi bagian tak terpisahkan dalam hidup masyarakat kita. Keberadaannya telah mengubah kebiasaan mereka dalam bergaul, membaca, berbelanja. Indonesia memiliki penetrasi pengguna interet sekitar 75 juta orang atau sekitar 30 % dari total penduduk Indonesia per tahun 2013. Jumlah ini diprediksi akan menyentuh angka hingga 100 juta pengguna per tahun 2016 (Ystats.com, 2014). Dalam mengakses internet, lebih dari setengah pengguna internet di Indonesia mengaksesnya melalui piranti seluler dan sekitar 25 % dari populasi orang dewasa di Indonesia memiliki iphone smart. Diprediksi per tahun 2018, angka pengguna internet di Indonesia menempati urutan ketiga setelah RRT dan India.

Indonesia dalam hal ini pemerintah atau instansi yang terkait harus mendorong industri kecil dan menengah atau IKM untuk ikut menangkap peluang Industri 4.0 dengan memanfaatkan perkembangan teknologi manufaktur terkini. Dalam era Industri 4.0 tidak bisa lagi dihindari karena sudah berjalan, dan sistem revolusi industri keempat tersebut mengintegrasikan setiap sektor produksi secara real time. 

Dengan adanya program e-Smart IKM, pada awal 2017 salah satu tujuannya adalah meningkatkan akses pasar melalui internet marketing. Sepanjang 2017, Kemenperin mencatat lebih dari 1.730 pelaku usaha telah bergabung dalam program e-Smart IKM, yang berasal dari 23 provinsi. Pada 2019, ditargetkan akan mencapai 10 ribu pelaku IKM seluruh Indonesia. Program ini juga mendorong para pelaku IKM agar melakukan terobosan inovasi dengan memperbaiki produk, pengembangan desain, serta mengikuti pendidikan dan pelatihan.

Dewasa ini ada beberapa UMKM dan IKM menggunakan e-mail marketing, namun hanya sekedar mengirim secara massal. Padahal e-mail marketing dapat diberdayakan secara lebih cerdas dan tepat guna, sehingga energi yang terpakai tidak terbuang percuma dan pengelola merek tidak dicap sebagai spammer oleh konsumen. E-mail marketing adalah salah satu bentuk promosi digital marketing yang paling mudah dan paling murah dilakukan dengan banyak kelebihan dibandingkan dengan ragam dan varian marketing tradisional, antara lain televisi, radio dan aktivitas below the line.   E-mail marketing memiliki biaya yang sangat rendah, dan apa yang menarik adalah adanya kemampuan mekanisme umpan balik (feedback). Kita dapat mengetahui konsumen mana saja yang membuka e-mail, menelusuri kontennya, termasuk tentunya memberikan balasan. Pengetahuan mengenai aktivitas konsumen melalui e-mail marketing ini menunjukkan diferensiasi yang sangat signifikan dibandingkan dengan kegaiatan marketing tradisional.

Secara singkat manfaat e-mail marketing kembali ke hal paling mendasar dari konsep marketing, yaitu melakukan segmentasi dan menetapkan target konsumen yang kita pilih dan mampu kita penuhi kebutuhannya. Agar UMKM dan IKM mengetahui perubahan minat dan selera konsumen, berarti harus mengetahui tren yang berjalan hingga kini. Saat menjalankan strategi e-mail marketing, tren juga harus diperhatikan. Jika kita tetap berpegang pada strategi tersebut akan lapuk dan terlihat membosankan dimata konsumen. Sepanjang kita menginginkan keberhasilan untuk memahami konsumen secara berkelanjutan, berarti kita perlu melakukan percobaan-percobaaan secara cerdas dan terukur.

Dalam konsep marketing ada yang disebut dengan Promotional Mix (bauran promosi). Artinya dalam melakukan promosi harus menggunakan mix juga. Caranya dengan advertising, promotion, sponsiorship, menggunakan media massa juga direct marketing. Apalagi sekarang kita ramai bicara cyber generation yaitu generasi yang sudah hook up pada produk digital, sehingga usaha apapun dari makan sampai fashion, dari produk elektronik sampai otomotif memanfaatkan internet marketing (online) dan traditional marketing (offline).

  Indonesia khususnya UMKM apalagi IKM akan mendapatkan keuntungan yang besar dari revolusi industri digital. Dimana sektor publik, dan swasta harus fokus berinvestasi pada teknologi digital dengan peningkatan infrastruktur, penetrasi internet dan mendorong produktivitas sehingga mempercepat pertumbuhan ekonomi. Potensi ekonomi digital yang besar menuntut pemerintah Indonesia secepatnya menjadikan ekonomi digital sebagai salah satu prioritas pembangunan nasional, yang mesti dianggarkan dalam APBN dan mulai melakukan transformasi di semua sektor untuk menjadi negara berpenghasilan menengah di tahun yang akan datang.

  Penguatan dan percepatan pembangunan ekonomi digital akan memainkan peran penting dalam mencapai potensi penuh Indonesia. Ditunjang dengan Indutri Kecil Menengah (IKM) yang bergerak di bidang ekonomi digital melalui e-commerce, media broadband, media sosial, komputasi awan, mobile platform dan teknologi finansial, kita dapat memiliki pertumbuhan pendapatan yang lebih cepat, lebih inovatif dan lebih kompetitif di Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN.

Merebaknya pandemi Covid-19 memberikan dampak besar terhadap perekonomian di Indonesia. Tantangan perekonomian saat ini sangatlah berat. Masyarakat berada dalam kondisi waspada dan sangat berhati-hati dengan adanya anjuran work from home, stay at home mengakibatkan adanya pembatasan ke luar rumah dan konsumsi, tentunya hal ini berimbas kepada transaksi jual beli di pasaran. Denyut nadi ekonomi seperti sesak nafas akibat badai corona yang menerjang terjang sejak Februari silam. Yang terpukul pertama, dalam situasi ini, tentulah usaha kecil menengah ke bawah. Repotnya, justru UMKM inilah, dengan sektor informal di dalamnya, adalah tiang penyangga ekonomi nasional. Bagaimana tidak. Menurut catatan UMKM Crisis Center, sektor UMKM berperan besar bagi ekonomi negara ini. Sektor itu menyerap lebih dari 100 juta tenaga kerja dan berkontribusi sekitar 60 % terhadap produk domestik bruto (PDB).

Ada beberapa cara UMKM agar bisa survive dalam masa pandemi Covid-19 ke new normal dengan memperkuat Imunitas UMKM. Oleh karena itu upaya yang harus dilakukan UMKM sebagai berikut:

1)UMKM harus menjaga posisi dana tunai, maksudnya amankan likuiditas, solbavilitas perusahaan, tunda beberapa kewajiban yang bisa ditunda misal dengan cara negosisasi, keterbukaan, jujur terkait kondisi saat ini terhadap supplier, perbankan. Perbaharui rencana bisnis yang ada (business plan yang baru), sesuaikan dengan kondisi Covid-19 masuk ke new normal. Prediksi kebutuhan dana baik bagi usaha mikro, kecil dan menengah;
2)Adapt to New normal, artinya UMKM harus bisa menyesuaikan diri/beradaptasi terhadap keadaan sekarang (New Normal) caranya dengan work from home, menjaga kesehatan, keselamatan keluarga, karyawan. Dengan waktu yang cepat temukan peluang bisnis baru, problem solving, inovasi produk, inovasi usaha. Adapun peluang bisnis itu ada pada bidang: kesehatan (APD, masker, hand sanitizer); teknlologi (aplikasi google meet, Bigbluebutton, zoom, virtual meeting secara daring/online); farmasi, jamu/peningkatan imunitas; pangan/pengusaha kuliner rumahan; new normal memerlukan jejaring distribusi yang lebih luas yang disebut network of network. Dimana network of network membutuhkan reseller artinya cepat tanggap/adaptasi mencari informasi apa yang dibutuhkan oleh masyarakat. New normal adalah online mindset/digitalisasi, digitalisasi akan menjadi passion, tools dan taste masa depan kita sehingga memiliki kemampuan di maketing, payment (pembayaran) dan penyediaan melalui logistik. Jadi pegiat UMKM harus menyusun strategi digital agar dapat bertahan dan tetap berkembang;
3)Survive Through Ecosystem, artinya kita akan bertahan kalau kita mampu bertahan dalam ekosistem kita. Jadi bagaimana kita membangun mental (we are all in this together), upayakan selalu berkomunikasi dengan mentor dan coach. Bangun jejaring (beyond boundaries), manfaatkan fasilitas perbankan pemerintah untuk menangani masalah usaha yang dihadapi dalam masa Covid-19 ini sehingga bisa memberikan yang terbaik untuk masyarakat, ekonomi berbasis silahturahim;
4)Invest In This Time, artinya dengan work from home kita harus meningkatkan kemampuan/skill kita misal dengan mengikuti webinar, workshop/pelatihan secara daring;
5)Be The Calm in the Strom artinya dalam masa Covid-19 ke new normal kita harus tenang dalam menghadapinya dengan usaha semaksimal mungkin, berdo’a, memiliki rasa optimis tidak memiliki rasa pesimis, semangat dan kerja keras, bisnis yang booming harus branding & soft selling jangan hard selling, bisnis yang bisa survive bukan yang besar/menengah/kecil tetapi yang bisa beradaptasi, hadapi kenyataan, fokus apa yang harus dilakukan dan bantu orang lain/peduli sosial, up grade diri untuk beralih dari offline ke online selling, everithing is changing.

.

Write by : Keni Kaniawati, SE., M.Si.; Dosen Tetap Universitas Widyatama, Ketua Widyatama Business Incubator

Email: [email protected]; No kontak: 082319616313/081221791046

BUMANTARA

.

BUMANTARA

togamas_17133_Bumantara

.

.

Judul : Bumantara
Penerbit : PT. Alex Media Komputindo
Penulis : Ulva Afdillah Umar
Ketebalan : 196 hlm
Dimensi : 14 cm x 21 cm
Cover : Soft Cover (doff)
ISBN : 978-623-00-1886-2
Berat : 300 gr
Tahun Terbit : 2020

.

.

Semesta selalu saja menciptakan konspirasi di dalamnya. Manusia diciptakan untuk bertemu satu sama lain, seperti halnya Adam dan Hawa yang meski terpisah jauh namun pada akhirnya dipertemukan oleh Allah. Untuk saling menguji, hidup berdampingan, dan menjadi pengingat satu sama lain.

.

Menguji dalam hal apa? Dalam hal kesabaran dan kekuatan hati. Berdampingan dalam hal apa? Dalam segala bentuk interaksi yang diciptakan dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat maupun berkeluarga. Pengingat apa? Pengingat dalam hal beribadah.

.

“Tidak akan ada kehidupan tanpa kematian. Maka tidak ada pula pertemuan tanpa perpisahan. Dan kembali lagi, kematian adalah perpisahan yang sebenarnya”_hal 6.

_________________________________________

.

Buku ini mengusung judul BUMANTARA, secara Bahasa artinya Angkasa. Menggambarkan betapa dunia benar-benar sudah sangat tua untuk kita yang masih sibuk mengejar nikmatnya. Banyak hal di muka bumi ini yang bisa dijadikan sebagai pelajaran. Ujian hidup yang kita alami adalah sebaik-baiknya pelajaran yang harus dipetik hikmahnya. Hidup akan terus berputar sampai ia diperintahkan untuk berhenti. Ujian datang kepada kita untuk menguatkan. Dan sebaik-baik manusia adalah yang paling bermanfaat bagi orang lain.

.

Pernahkah menemukan orang-orang yang senantiasa ridlo terhadap hidup yang sedang dilalui? Atau orang-orang yang didiagnosis dengan penyakit kronis, namun masih bisa mengukir senyum di wajahnya? Atau juga orang-orang yang bekerja dengan gaji tidak seberapa, namun tetap melakoninya?

.

Orang-orang seperti ini adalah mereka yang dianugerahi hati yang kuat oleh Tuhan. Mereka senantiasa berbahagia dengan apa yang sedang direncanakan Tuhan untuknya. Orang-orang yang bermental baja, berhati lapang, dan bertekad kuat. Ujian hidup tidak menjadikan mereka lemah dimata manusia. Namun, mereka menjadikan Tuhan sebagai satu-satunya juri dalam kehidupan. Penilai apa saja yang sedang mereka lakoni. Manusia diciptakan di dunia, untuk berlomba-lomba dalam kebaikan (Fastabiqul Khairat). Ada banyak perbuatan baik yang bisa dikerjakan, tanpa lupa harus bersyukur dan tanpa harus banyak mengeluh. Meskipun sifat dasar manusia memang suka mengeluh, apabila ditimpa kesusahan mereka mengeluh, dan ketika mendapatkan kebaikan berupa harta, justru mereka kikir. Padahal sejatinya, mengeluh tidak akan mengubah keadaan tetapi justru hanya akan menambah beban yang ada.

.

Ingatlah bahwa Tuhan menurunkan ujian untuk menguji tarap keimanan setiap hambanya, dan Tuhan memberikan ujian karena Dia sayang dan ingin menyapa hambanya. Teka teki permasalahan pasti ada jalan keluarnya, tinggal bagaimana cara kita menyikapi permasalahan tersebut. Apakah hanya akan diam berpangku tangan sambil menghujat dan menghakimi ini itu, atau berusaha bangkit, ikhtiar dan berdoa untuk menyelesaikan permasalahan.

.

“Mengeluh bukan jalan keluar. Pun tidak akan menjadikanmu baik-baik saja. Hadapi, nikmati dan jalani setiap masalah yang ada. Jangan mengeluh, Tuhan sedang mengujimu” hal 22.

.

“Dan ingatlah ketika Tuhanmu memaklumkan, sesungguhnya jika kamu bersyukur, niscaya aku akan menambahkan nikmat kepadamu. Tetapi jika kamu mengingkari nikmat-Ku, maka pasti Azab-Ku sangat berat” (QS. Ibrahim:7)

.

Karena hidup ini bukan hanya perihal aku, kamu, dan kita. Di luar sana, di belahan bumi yang lainnya, Saudara-saudara kita juga memerlukan perhatian lebih. Pedulilah pada mereka. tidak mudah berputus asa dan tidak mudah puas dalam mencari ilmu. Mencari ilmu tidak hanya di lembaga formal seperti sekolah, tetapi bisa juga dengan mengikuti beberapa kajian ilmu. Karena sesungguhnya apa yang kita peroleh saat ini hanyalah sebagian kecil dari ilmu yang tersebar di bumi. Tanamkan dalam hati, bahwa hidup adalah perihal belajar. Maka jika kita tidak belajar, kebodohan akan senantiasa mengitari hidup.

.

“Jangan cepat puas pada satu ilmu. Jangan merasa cukup hanya karena hari ini belajar banyak. Namun merasa kuranglah agar kamu senantiasa merasa haus akan ilmu”.

.

Banyak orang-orang terdahulu yang memilih mengarungi bentang samudra hanya untuk mencari ilmu. Bahkan hingga saat ini, banyak orang yang mampu menjadi inspirasi kita untuk terus menuntut ilmu. “semakin berisi, semakin menunduk” pepatah ini tentu sering kita dengar, bukan? Umumnya dikenal dengan istilah ilmu padi. Perlu diketahui, bahwa Itu bukan sekadar pepatah kuno, karena di dalamnya kita akan menemukan ilmu yang luar biasa. Padi, tanaman yang darinya kita mampu mengolah sebutir beras menjadi sebakul nasi. Saat tumbuh dan menjulang ke atas, ia tidak serta merta berdiri dan menegakkan kepala untuk sekadar menjadi perhatian tanaman lainnya. Ia memilih merunduk ke bawah. Dia tidak lupa dari mana dia berasal dan bermula.

.

Semoga buku ini mampu membawa kita pada tingkat pemahaman dan kesadaran bahwa saat ini, kita berada pada titik di mana gejolak problem sedang meningkat. Segala hiruk-pikuk dunia yang kerap diabaikan menimpa banyak umat manusia. Sedangkan kesadaran kita untuk mengetahuinya sering kali hilang entah ke mana. Melalui buku ini, semoga kita semua tersadar jika kematian itu benar-benar ada dan selalu mengintai kita. Hingga akhirnya kita senantiasa mempersiapkan diri untuk dijemput oleh-Nya, dalam keadaan baik (husnul Khatimah).

.

Intan Liswandini

.